Louisiana Congressional Timing Upset by Federal Court

On January 23, U.S. District Court Judge Frank Polozola ruled from the bench that Louisiana cannot hold its congressional elections in late September or early October. Love v Edwards, 95-cv-788. The state hasn’t decided whether to appeal. The decision was no surprise, since the US Supreme Court had ruled the same way in this same case back in 1997. In 2005 the legislature had passed a new variation of the old law. The new variation said that the election was “deemed” to be in November.

Louisiana is the only state in which political parties do not nominate candidates for congress. Instead, all candidates run in the election on a single ballot. Usually someone gets over 50%, and the election is over. When no one gets 50%, Louisiana holds a run-off between the top two. Louisiana would like to hold its election in September, and if a run-off is needed, hold that in November. But a federal law, passed in 1872, orders the states to hold congressional elections in November, and says if the state wants a run-off to ensure the winner gets 50%, that run-off must be after the November election.

The decision will put pressure on Louisiana to either use Instant-Runoff Voting for its congressional elections, or else reinstate the system used in all other states, in which parties nominate candidates.

Minnesota Republican Party Wins Free Speech Case

On January 23, the US Supreme Court refused to disturb the Minnesota Republican Party’s victory in the 8th circuit last August. The 8th circuit had struck down a state regulation, making it illegal for candidates for judge to “identify themselves as members of a political party” or to “attend a political gathering or seek, accept or use an endorsement from a political organization”. Dimick v Republican Party of Minnesota, 05-566.

Hopeful Development in Nader Ohio Ballot Access Case

In 2004, Ralph Nader challenged the Ohio law that requires circulators for independent candidates to be registered voters in the state. Both the U.S. District Court and the 6th circuit refused to rule on the constitutionality of the law. The 6th circuit had ruled on November 16, 2005, that the case is moot. Nader had then asked for reconsideration. On January 20, 2006, the Court asked attorneys for the Secretary of State to respond to Nader’s petition for rehearing. This indicates there is a fair chance that the rehearing will be granted.

First 3rd party candidate for US House in Georgia this year?

A Georgia Libertarian, Jay Fisher, will make a serious attempt to become the first political party nominee (other than a Democrat or Republican) to appear on the ballot for U.S. House of Representatives from Georgia in the last 63 years. In 1943 Georgia enacted a law that requires minor party and independent candidates for U.S. House to submit a petition signed by 5% of the registered voters in that district. No independent has managed this since 1964, and no minor party nominee has ever done it. Jay Fisher is a Deputy Attorney General, an activist in LEAP (Law Enforcement Personnel Against Prohibition), and was a paramedic while attending law school. He needs campaign contributions to cope with the requirement that he collect 15,000 valid signatures from the 6th district. His address is 3013 Mulberry St., Marietta Ga 30066.

If he succeeds, there will be publicity about the petition requirement, which will help garner support for easing the requirement.