U.S. District Court Refuses to Strike Down Georgia 5% Petition Requirement for Minor Party and Independent Candidates for U.S. House

On September 27, U.S. District Court Judge Leigh Martin May dismissed Cowen v Raffensperger, n.d., 1:17cv-4660. This is the lawsuit filed in 2017 by the Georgia Libertarian Party against the 5% petition requirement for U.S. House candidates who are not nominees of a party that had polled 20% of the vote in the last election. The petition is so severe, no party has ever managed to complete it, even though it has existed for 80 years.

The Eleventh Circuit had upheld the law in 2022, but the Eleventh Circuit had seemed to leave an opening to attack the law on Equal Protection grounds. The case returned to U.S. District Court. But now Judge May has decided that the Eleventh Circuit had even foreclosed an Equal Protection argument. Here is her 13-page order.

The only justification for the law that the Eleventh Circuit had mentioned in its 2022 order was the “compelling interest” a state has to keep candidates off the ballot if they don’t have a “modicum of support.” The Eleventh Circuit did not elaborate on that point. If this argument were true, every state in the nation would have a “compelling” reason to ban all candidates from all ballots who weren’t capable of completing a petition signed by 5% of the registered voters in that jurisdiction. This is truly absurd. No candidate for any statewide race, or any U.S. House race, in the last fifty years in any state, has managed to complete a petition of 5% of the registered voters.

California Legislature Passes Bill Letting Santa Clara County Use Ranked Choice Voting for its Own Officers

On September 7, the California legislature passed AB 1227, which lets Santa Clara County, the most populous county in northern California, use ranked choice voting for elections for county officers. It will be fascinating to see if Governor Gavin Newsom signs this bill. He is believed to be opposed to rank choice voting, and he has consistently vetoed bills to let all non-charter cities use ranked choice voting.

U.S. District Court in California Suggests Voters Do Not Have Standing to Challenge Former President Donald Trump’s Ballot Access

On September 25, U.S. District Court Judge Lynn Sammartino, a Bush Jr. appointee, issued a Show Cause order in Schaefer v USA and Trump, s.d. California, 3:23cv-1451. Her order says that the plaintiff, Michael Schaefer, a California voter, probably doesn’t have standing to bring a challenge to former President Donald Trump’s ballot status in the California Republican presidential primary. The judge is permitting Schaefer to file a brief in defense of his own standing. It is not due until October 27. Here is the judicial order.

Opposing Sides in Michigan Libertarian Intra-Party Lawsuit Have Drastically Different Preferences for Timing of Trial

On September 25, both sides in the lawsuit Libertarian National Committee v Saliba, e.d., 5:23cv-11074, filed a joint report with the U.S. District Court judge, expressing their opinions about the timing of the trial. The Libertarian National Committee wants it to start on April 1, 2024; the faction of the Michigan Libertarian Party that is not recognized by the national committee wants it to start October 1, 2024.

The LNC wants the substantive briefs to be due February 29, 2024, the other side wants them due August 15, 2024.

The trial is expected to last three days. Here is the joint report. The judge will now decide the schedule.

In the meantime, the Sixth Circuit has received the appeal of the faction of the Libertarian Michigan Party that is not recognized by the FEC. 23-1856. The issue in the Sixth Circuit is whether the U.S. District Court should have enjoined the non-LNC faction from calling itself “Libertarian Party of Michigan” while the lawsuit proceeds. The Sixth Circuit is sending that to mediation, which will be held on October 20.