California Bill to Make it More Difficult to Qualify an Initiative is Amended

On May 18, California AB 421 was amended to make it less restrictive. The original bill outlawed paying initiative circulators on a per-signature basis. It also required that 10% of the needed signatures be collected by volunteers. The amended bill says that initiative circulators may be paid on a per-signature basis, if the group sponsoring the initiative agrees to collect at least 5% of the needed signatures by volunteers.

So far the bill has passed the Assembly Elections Committee, but otherwise has not advanced.

Ballotpedia Notes that 2023 Has Seen More Bills Making Ballot Access More Difficult

Ballotpedia here notes that in 2023, there have been many bills making ballot access more difficult, compared to 2022 and also compared to the number of bills making it easier. The article does not note the New Mexico bill that doubled the number of signatures for non-presidential nominees of qualified parties that nominate by convention.

Pretrial Conference Set for Virginia Libertarian Trademark Lawsuit

An initial pretrial conference in Libertarian National Committee v Dean, e.d. Va., 3:23cv155, will be held on June 15. This is the first trademark lawsuit filed by the Libertarian Party. It charges that Robert Klor Dean and the Tidewater Libertarian Party have violated the national party’s trademark. Dean has apparently not retained an attorney. He filed his own response to the Complaint and appears willing to change the name of the Tidewater Libertarian Party.

Mississippi Democratic Candidate for Governor Wins Lawsuit Putting Him Back on the Primary Ballot

On May 26, a Mississippi state trial court ruled that Bob Hickingbottom should be restored to the August 2023 Democratic primary ballot. He is running for the party’s nomination for Governor. The general election is November 7, 2023. Hickingbottom v The Mississippi State Democratic Party, Hinds Co. Circuit Court 23-249. The decision is not yet in writing, but was delivered orally by the judge.

The Democratic Party had removed him from its primary ballot on the grounds that he had not filed a Statement of Economic Interest. Hickingbottom asserts that no law authorizes removing a candidate from the ballot for that reason. Candidates who fail to file a Statement of Economic Interest are subject to a fine. Here is the Brief filed by Hickingbottom. It had been filed on May 3.