Random Lengths News, a newspaper in San Pedro, California, has this article about what California Democratic Party leaders are thinking about the top-two system.
Illinois held its primaries on March 17, 2026. In Massac County, the Constitution Party is a ballot-qualified party, so a primary was held for it. The party is only permitted to nominate for partisan county office. It is a qualified party in Massac County because in November 2024, its nominee for County Commission-at-large, Tim Pearcy, polled 11.8%. The race also had a Republican and a Democrat running. Illinois lets a party that polls at least 5% for a countywide office be a qualified party within that particular county.
At the March 17 primaries, the Constitution Party ballot was chosen by only one voter.
Massac County has a population of approximately 12,000. It is on the southern border of Illinois, against the Ohio River, adjoining Kentucky.
Here is a newspaper account of the Hearing in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court over whether the state constitution can be interpreted to accept Ranked Choice Voting for state office in general elections. The hearing was held on April 1.
An initiative is circulating in Massachusetts for a top-two system. See the text here. If the initiative passed, minor parties would almost never be ballot-qualified. Current law says a qualified party is one that polled 3% for any statewide race, or which has registration of 1% of the state total.
No party, other than the Democratic and Republican Parties, has ever held as much as 1% of the registration in Massachusetts. So if the initiative passed, a party could only be ballot-qualified if it could poll 3% for president. And even if it did poll 3% for president, after the next midterm election, it would lose its status.
The chief proponent for the initiative, Jesse Littlewood, told me that his initiative does not lower the difficult petition requirements for candidates because his group was afraid that if the initiative did improve the petition requirements, that would violate the single-subject rule. He also said that he had not heard about any unhappiness with the California top-two system in connection with the 2026 gubernatorial election.
On April 1, U.S. District Court Judge Maxine Chesney issued a one-page document in Peace & Freedom Party v Weber, 3:24cv-8308, n.d. It says she expects to rule on the government’s motion to dismiss the case sometime during April.