Steven Greenhut, writing in the American Spectator, says in this article that the idea of California replacing top-two with top-five is “gaining traction”, although the article does not provide specifics. Thanks to Fairvote for the link.
16
On June 15, Ben Chavis, a national co-chair of No Labels, said No Labels will not run a presidential nominee in 2024 if general election polls show that President Biden is the Democratic nominee and that he is far ahead. See this story. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.
On June 7, the California Assembly Elections Committee passed SB 437 unanimously. It requires qualified parties to notify the Secretary of State of the identities of their presidential and vice-presidential nominees by 75 days before the general election. Existing law has no deadline for that, which seems peculiar, but other states similarly have no deadline either.
This first public Ranked Choice Voting election in Virginia history will be held in Arlington County on Tuesday, June 20. It is the Democratic Party primary for the Arlington County Board of Supervisors. It will use multiwinner RCV, as two Democrats (out of six primary candidates) will advance to the November 2023 General Election.
Here is a recent story from FairVote:
https://fairvote.org/what-to-know-about-arlingtons-first-proportional-rcv-election/
All previous RCV elections in Virginia were at either conventions or private primary elections. Recognized parties in Virginia have an option to nominate by public primary, private primary or convention. The private primary was usually called a “firehouse primary,” because they were sometimes held at firehouses, but were also held at other public locations.
Any registered voter could vote, but they usually only if they signed a statement declaring that they would vote for the primary winner in the General Election, which was not legally enforceable.
On June 13, an attorney for the No Labels Party of Maine asked the Secretary of State to reveal the evidence that No Labels workers had tricked any voter into registering into No Labels.
Last month, the Secretary of State sent a letter to all 6,456 registrants in No Labels, asserting that workers for No Labels had tricked some people into registering with the party, and asking the recipient if he or she wants to re-register out of No Labels. In Maine, a party becomes ballot-qualified by persuading 5,000 people to register into the party.
Here is the letter, which says that what the Secretary of State did is unprecedented. To see the whole letter, click on the box in the upper right corner.
Actually there is a precedent. In 1979 in California, as the Libertarian Party was finishing up its registration drive for party status, election officials also asserted some voters had been tricked, and prepared to send a letter similar to the Maine letter to all the Libertarian registrants in certain counties. The California Libertarian Party sued in Superior Court to stop the letter from being sent out. The case was settled when the officials agreed not to send the letter until after the party had qualified. In California, when a party got enough registered members to qualify as of a particular date, it remained on the ballot even if its registration later declined below the required number. So postponing the issuance of that letter did not affect the Libertarian Party’s qualified status. The case was Libertarian Party of California v Eu, Orange County Superior Court, case 32-50-01, settled on December 19, 1979.