March 2023 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
March 2023 – Volume 38, Number 10

This issue was printed on white paper.


Table of Contents

  1. DELAWARE WILL NO LONGER DEFEND ITS BAN ON MINOR PARTY AND INDEPENDENT JUDGES
  2. MISSISSIPPI INITIATIVE MAY BE RESTORED
  3. BALLOT ACCESS BILLS
  4. STUNNING COURT WIN FOR INITIATIVES
  5. BOOK REVIEW: LABORATORIES AGAINST DEMOCRACY
  6. TOP MINOR PARTY LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATES 1946-2022
  7. 2024 INDEPENDENT U.S. SENATE PETITION REQUIREMENTS
  8. CALIFORNIA TOP-TWO SYSTEM COULD DISTORT 2024 SENATE ELECTION
  9. GEORGIA SPECIAL ELECTION
  10. MISSISSIPPI LIBERTARIANS SET RECORD IN 2023 ELECTION
  11. NEW FEDERAL CAMPAIGN LIMITS
  12. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

New Hampshire Bill to Put State’s Desire to Hold First Presidential Primary into State Constitution

On March 21, the New Hampshire Senate Election Laws & Municipal Affairs Committee passed CACR9. It is a proposed constitutional amendment to say that New Hampshire shall hold the nation’s earliest presidential primary in each presidential election year. If the legislature passes this bill, the voters would vote on the amendment in November 2024.

This seems like a silly idea. New Hampshire cannot by itself guarantee that it always has the nation’s earliest presidential primary, so putting that idea into the State Constitution won’t accomplish its goal.

Illinois Bill to Move Primary Petition Deadline from December of the Year Before the Election, to November

Illinois Senator Julie A. Morrison (D-Deerfield) has introduced SB 2306, to move the petition filing deadline for primary candidates from 106 days before the primary, to 134 days before the primary. Illinois primaries for all federal and state office are in March. If the bill became law, primary petitions would move from early December of the year before the election, to early November of the year before the election.

It is almost comical that the United States has a federal election system in which, in at least one state, a major party candidate for Congress might be required to file a petition an entire year before the election itself. In most other countries, candidates can file a few weeks, or at most a few months, before the election.

Seventh Circuit Says Illinois Ballot Access Case is Moot

On March 22, the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Gill v Linnabary, 22-1653. This is the challenge to the petition requirement for independent candidates for U.S. House in Illinois. The law requires a petition of 5% of the last vote cast, except that in years ending with the numeral “two”, the requirement is exactly 5,000 signatures.

The case was filed in 2016 and had a complicated history. The plaintiff-candidate David Gill won injunctive relief in U.S. District Court in 2016, and was ordered on to the ballot. But then the 7th circuit countermanded that relief with a single sentence and no explanation. Then the case went back to the original U.S. District Court Judge to settle the declaratory relief. But then another U.S. District Court Judge had all his criminal cases taken away from him, and because he needed work, many civil cases were transferred to him. He then upheld the 5% requirement, making some factual errors.

Gill appealed, and the Seventh Circuit noted the factual errors, and sent the case back to be re-done. After the previous U.S. District Court judge recused himself, the case was given to a third U.S. District Court Judge, who upheld the requirement. Gill appealed to the Seventh Circuit again. Now, the Seventh Circuit has declared the case moot on the grounds that the district he had wanted to run in back in 2016 no longer exists, due to redistricting. The Seventh Circuit said that part of Gill’s arguments involved the particular characteristics of the district, which didn’t have any real population centers in it, which made petitioning more difficult.

Never before had a constitutional ballot access case been held moot because of intervening redistricting. The Seventh Circuit vacated the U.S. District Court decision, which means the slate on the issue is wiped clean, and a new lawsuit can be filed, and it probably will be. The Seventh Circuit decision is by Judge Michael B. Brennan, and is also signed by Judges Michael Y. Scudder and Amy J. St. Eve, all Trump appointees.

The uncontradicted evidence showed that no petitioning candidate for U.S. House in Illinois had managed to complete the 5% petition successfully, if the candidate was challenged, since 1974. In Illinois, unchallenged candidates get on the ballot automatically if the number of signatures they submitted equalls at least 10% of the requirement.

Illinois and Georgia have the two most difficult petition requirements in the nation for U.S. House. They are the only two states with a 5% petition requirement for that office. Although South Carolina also has a 5% petition requirement for U.S. House, the number of signatures is capped at 10,000.