Texas Bill to Vastly Stiffen the Definition of a Qualified Party

On March 7, Texas State Senator Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola) introduced SB 1660. It changes the definition of a qualified party from one that got 2% for any statewide race at either of the last five elections, to one that got 10% in any of the last five election. If enacteds, it would remove the Libertarian and Green Parties from the ballot. Senator Hughes is chair of the State Affairs Committee, which will hear the bill. Thanks to Linda Curtis for this news.

The only states with a 10% vote test are Virginia and New Jersey. Alabama has a 20% vote test, but all other vote tests are 5% or below. The median vote test is 2%.

UPDATE: the Republican Party of Texas did not poll as much as 10% for any statewide office in 1912, 1914, 1934, 1938, and 1942.

If enacted, the bill would take effect on September 1, 2023. States in the past that made the definition of a party more difficult have always been careful to provide that the change doesn’t take effect until after the next election, but the Texas bill would remove parties without giving them a chance to meet the new requirement. Examples of the better approach are Indiana in 1980, Kansas in 1984, New Hampshire in 1996, North Carolina in 1948, and New York in both 1935 and 2020.

In 1982, when the Alabama legislature changed the definition of a qualified party from any organized group, to a group that had polled 20%, the Voting Rights Section of the U.S. Justice Department told Alabama that the new definition could not take effect until after the 1982 election.

New Mexico Bill, Doubling Number of Signatures for Minor Party Non-Presidential Nominees, Advances

On March 6, the New Mexico House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs passed SB 180. It is an omnibus election law bill that doubles the number of signatures for the non-presidential nominees of qualified minor parties, from 1% of the last gubernatorial vote, to 2%. That will be approximately 15,000 signatures in 2024.

Now the bill goes to the House.

Hawaii Removes Constitution Party from Ballot Because It Had No Candidates in 2022

The Hawaii Elections office has removed the Constitution Party from qualified status. It didn’t run any candidates in 2022. The Hawaii law on how a party remains on the ballot is very strange. Once it has been on the ballot in three elections in a row, then it is automatically on the ballot for the next five elections. The Constitution Party was on the ballot by petition in 2016, 2018, and 2020, so by that means it earned its “free” period (2022-2030). During the three elections in which it petitioned, it was not required to have candidates, and it did not have any in 2018, but that wasn’t held against it.

But, it turns out, once the party is in its “free” period, it must then run at least one candidate in every election, or the qualification is cancelled. Thanks to Thomas Jones for this news.

New Mexico Bill that Restricts Ballot Access Has Hearing on Monday, March 6

The New Mexico House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs Committee will hear SB 180a on Monday, March 6. This is the bill that doubles the number of signatures for the non-presidential nominees of qualified minor parties, from 1% of the last gubernatorial vote, to 2%. The bill has already passed the Senate. The Green Party is working to try to delete that provision from the bill. The bill is an omnibus election law bill with many unrelated election law provisions.

New Mexico is the only state that requires the nominees of qualified parties to submit a petition in order to be on the general election ballot.