Vermont Proposal to Ban Fusion

Vermont permits aggregated fusion. It is possible for two parties to nominate the same person, but in order to get the nomination of a second party, the candidate must win that party’s nod by write-ins at the primary. When someone is the nominee of two parties, both party labels are printed on the November ballot next to the candidate’s name, but there is only one square on the ballot to vote for that person, so the voter can’t demonstrate which party is preferred.

Vermont Representative Michael McCarthy (D-St. Albans) has introduced Draft Bill 23-0705. Because it is just a draft bill, not an introduced bill, the text is not available on the Vermont legislature’s website. But according to this article, it would ban fusion. The article says that Representative McCarthy wants to ban fusion because of the 2022 election for Sheriff in Franklin County. That is puzzling, because in that race, only one candidate’s name was printed on the ballot. He was John Grismore, and he had the nomination of both the Democratic and Republican Parties. But he was found to have kicked a prisoner in August 2022, and two individuals then declared write-in candidacies against him. However, Grismore was elected, although he is still facing charges.

It’s not clear why Representative McCarthy wants to ban fusion. His bill also alters the filing deadline for independent candidates, but the article doesn’t say whether he wants to make that deadline earlier, or later. Perhaps he wants to make it later, so that in the Franklin County sheriff’s race, it would have been possible for an independent to have qualified. The current deadline is in early August, which was a little bit too early to allow a new candidate into the race. The article says the draft also would require write-in candidates to file a declaration of candidacy in order for the write-ins to be counted.

New Mexico Bill to Ease Petition Requirements for Minor Party and Independent Candidates

New Mexico Representatives Kathleen Cates (D-Rio Rancho) and Jason Harper (R-Rio Rancho) have introduced HB 347. It eases petition requirements for the nominees of qualified parties, and independent candidates, and candidates running in a major party primary.

Current independent petition requirements in New Mexico are among the most severe in the nation, 2% of the last gubernatorial vote (except independent presidential candidates need one-half of 1%). No state has a more severe independent requirement for statewide candidates, except Alabama’s 3% for non-presidential independent candidates. The bill lowers the independent requirements to 1,000 for statewide office, 500 for U.S. House, 100 for State Senate, and 50 for State House and county office.

The bill also eliminates the need for candidates in primaries who have their party’s endorsement to submit any petitions. And for primary candidates who don’t have their party’s endorsement, the bill lowers the petition from 3% of that party’s last vote, to the same 1,000 signatures for statewide office, 500 for U.S. House, 100 for State Senate, and 50 for State House, as apply to independent candidates.

Finally, the bill eases the petition requirements for nominees of qualified minor parties. New Mexico qualified minor parties nominate by convention, and New Mexico is the only state that requires convention nominees of qualified parties to submit any petitions at all. The bill lowers them from 1% of the last gubernatorial vote, to the same 1,000/500/100/50 described above.

Three California Democratic Congressmembers Have Taken Concrete Steps to Run for U.S. Senate in 2024

On February 16, it was revealed that California Congressmember Barbara Lee has filed with the Federal Election Commission to run for U.S. Senate from California in 2024. Already two other California Democrats had declared for that seat, Adam Schiff and Katie Porter. A possible fourth Democratic contender is Congressmember Ro Khanna.

If four Democratic congressmembers run in the California top-two primary, that opens the possibility that none of the Democrats would place first or second, if there are two Republicans who run and who both have substantial support. In 2012, in the 31st U.S. House district, a district which was predominently Democratic, two Republicans and four Democrats ran, and the two Republicans placed first and second because the four Democrats split up the Democratic vote.

If two Republicans ended up on the November 2024 California ballot for U.S. Senate, and with no write-in space on that ballot, disenfranchsing Democrats, that would be the end of the top-two system in California. Democrats would go all-out to repeal it.