On April 12, the Connecticut Joint Committee on Government Administration & Elections passed SB 6908 unanimously. It moves the 2024 presidential primary from the last Tuesday in April to the first Tuesday in April.
2
On April 13, the Iowa House Ways & Means Committee passed HB 716 (formerly known as HSB 245). It says that presidential caucuses, which are run by political parties, cannot use mail ballots. All votes must be cast by people who are physically present. It also says no party can allow anyone to vote who has not been a registered member of that party for 70 days.
All Republicans on the committee voted for the bill, and all Democrats voted against it. The Iowa Democratic Party had not completely settled on what it wants to do, but it had been tentatively planning to allow mail ballots in its caucuses.
On March 26, the ballot-qualified Labor Party changed its name to the South Carolina Workers’ Party. South Carolina allows qualified parties to change their names. The party has been on the ballot in South Carolina starting in 1996. It has never run a presidential nominee. Thanks to Scott West for this news. See the party’s facebook page.
The Flathead Beacon, in Kalispell, Montana, has this lengthy story about attempts by some Montana legislators to remove the Libertarian Party from the ballot. One bill removes the party totally; another party effectively removes it only from the 2024 U.S. Senate race. The story partly consists of an interview with Sid Daoud, state chair of the Montana Libertarian Party and a city council member in Kalispell.
The House hearing on the two bills is Friday, April 14. Both bills have already passed the State Senate.
This news story has more information about the Arizona Democratic Party lawsuit to remove No Labels Party from the ballot than any other I have seen. However, the story implies that the lawsuit involves federal campaign laws. Although the Democratic Party Complaint mentioned that, the Complaint does not ask the judge to remove No Labels on the basis of campaign laws. The sole request is that the party be removed from the ballot on the grounds that its officers filed some paperwork a few weeks too early.
Also, the story says that if No Labels is on the ballot, it may or may not run any candidates. However, assuming it gets on the Arizona ballot, the leaders of No Labels have no authority to prevent Arizona voters from filing to run for office in the No Labels Party primary, for congress and partisan state office. In Arizona, all qualified parties nominate by primary.
The lawsuit is moving slowly. According to the website of the Maricopa County Superior Court, no attorney has filed yet as the representative of No Labels.