Lawsuits concerning Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene’s qualifications to run for Congress are still pending in two courts.

Earlier this year, a U.S. District Court had ruled that Greene does not have a right to avoid a challenge in the state courts to her qualifications, relative to the Fourteenth Amendment’s “insurrection” clause. Therefore, Greene had to go through the challenge, which she won in lower state court. However, the challengers to her qualifications have appealed that to the State Supreme Court. That case is Rowan v Raffensperger.

In the meantime, Greene is hoping to persuade the Eleventh Circuit that the U.S. District Court should not have forced her to go through the state challenge process. She argues that state officials cannot adjudicate congressional qualifications. That case is Greene v Secretary of State, 22-11299. To bolster her federal case, on August 19, she notified the Eleventh Circuit that the state case is still alive. Here is her filing to the Eleventh Circuit, which includes as attachments the filings of the challengers in the State Supreme Court.

On August 24, the Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in Leibsohn v Hobbs, cv-22-0204. The issue was whether a statewide initiative should be removed from the ballot because some of the circulators’ paperwork was incomplete. The Court agreed with the lower courts that the paperwork problems should not result in removing the initiative from the ballot.

On the same day, the court issued a somewhat similiar opinion in Protect Our Arizona v Hobbs, cv-22-0203.

A third opinion, also issued on August 24, says that in some cases, the circulators’ failure to provide the unit number as part of the address might result in their work being disqualified. Mussi v Hobbs, cv-22-0207.

On August 25, the Eleventh Circuit issued an order in People’s Party of Florida v Florida Department of State, 22-12451. This is the lawsuit over the Florida law that won’t let a candidate run in a primary unless the candidate has been a member of that party for a full year before the June filing deadline. The order does not discuss the constitutional issues with this law. It just says that injunctive relief is not warrented because the party’s candidate, Elise Mysels, did not pay the filing fee back in June.

The order will not be published, and is signed “per curiam”. The three judges on the case are Robin Rosenbaum (an Obama appointee), Kevin Newsom (a Trump appointee), and Britt Grant (a Trump appointee).