On June 30, the People’s Party of Florida asked for reconsideration in its ballot access case, People’s Party of Florida v Florida Department of State, m.d., 8:22cv-1274. The brief is very convincing. It points out that the Florida law, requiring a candidate to have been a registered member of a party for 365 days before filing for office, bans new parties from having any nominees in its first election. This is clearly unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court several times has banned discrimination against new parties, relative to old parties.
On June 30, a lower state court in Florida added another Republican candidate to the primary ballot, for U.S. House. See this story. This is another instance in which the candidate had filed the wrong form, and the elections office accepted his filing, and didn’t tell him until it was too late that he had used the wrong form.
On June 24, the Ohio Supreme Court granted deadline relief to some candidates for various Ohio offices. Ohio is holding two primaries this year, one held in May for U.S. House and statewide office, and one on August 2 for legislative candidates and candidates for party office who are elected from legislative districts. No one expected the August primary to be held, and it is being held because the districts had been invalidated a few months ago. Despite the surprise of new legislative districts and a later primary for some offices, the Secretary of State had refused to relax the candidacy deadline of February 2.
The Ohio Supreme Court extended the deadline for those offices to May 4. The vote was 4-3. State ex rel De Mora v LaRise, 2022-Ohio-2173. Here is the decision.
UPDATE: a lower state court granted relief to another candidate on June 29. See this story.
The Raleigh News & Observer has this article about the State Board of Elections decision on June 30 not to certify the Green Party, even though the county election boards already checked the petition and found enough valid signatures. The story seems to say that only 145 people have asked to have their names removed from the petition.
Ballot Access News
June 2022 – Volume 38, Number 1
| This issue was printed on white paper. |
Table of Contents
- ALASKA LEGISLATURE EASES DEFINITION OF A QUALIFIED POLITICAL PARTY
- NEW YORK OUT-OF-STATE PETITIONER BAN ENJOINED
- ARIZONA BAN ON PAYING PETITIONERS PER SIGNATURE OVERTURNED
- ARIZONA LEGALIZES ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES FOR INDEPENDENTS
- “INSURRECTION” COURT DECISIONS
- NEW YORK CHANGES BOUNDARIES BUT WON’T EXTEND PETITION DEADLINE
- TENNESSEE QUALIFICATIONS CASE
- GEORGIA BALLOT ACCESS CASE
- MORE LAWSUIT NEWS
- SOUTH CAROLINA BANS FUSION
- LEGISLATIVE NEWS
- BOOK REVIEW: LIBERTARIANISM: JOHN HOSPERS, THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY’S 50th ANNIVERSARY, AND BEYOND
- INSTANCES OF GOOD BALLOT ACCESS BILLS THAT PASSED, 1972-2022
- INSTANCES OF GOOD BALLOT ACCESS BILLS THAT PASSED, 1922-1971
- FIVE REPUBLICAN GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATES REMOVED FROM MICHIGAN PRIMARY BALLOT
- AUSTRALIA 2022 ELECTION
- PETER ACKERMAN, FOUNDER OF AMERICANS ELECT, DIES
- PEACE & FREEDOM CANDIDATE FOR U.S. SENATE TOURS RUSSIAN-OCCUPIED PARTS OF UKRAINE
- ALASKA DEMOCRATS FEAR BEING EXCLUDED IN U.S. HOUSE SPECIAL
- SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL