Nevada Four-Candidate General Election Debate

On August 17, the four candidates for Nevada’s U.S. House seat, for the upcoming special election in the 2nd district, debated each other. See this story. The four candidates are the Republican, Democratic, Independent American Party nominees, and an independent candidate.

In the general election of 2010 in Nevada, no minor party or independent candidates for Congress or Governor were invited to debate their major party opponents, so the special 2011 election represents a gain for inclusive debates in Nevada.


Comments

Nevada Four-Candidate General Election Debate — No Comments

  1. Pingback: Nevada Four-Candidate General Election Debate | ThirdPartyPolitics.us

  2. I didn’t get to see the debate, but I’ll wager a free lunch that IAP nominee Tom Fasano used his time in attempting to educate the viewers that Social Security is bad, that Medicare is socialism, and that only until we return to an unbridled capitalist economic system will America survive. I also assume he wouldn’t even use the debate format to touch on the concept of a National Bank, issuing debt and interest free US Currency, an option provided to us by the Founding Fathers in Article I, Section VIII, Paragraph 5. Oh no, that would hurt the poor little private banking system which is what has caused our economic problems. Was there anyone who did watch the debate who can honestly say, “Alabama Independent, you’re wrong -Fasano did talk about a National Bank as you support.” If you can prove he did so, after I’ve recuperated from my “shock” I’ll see if I can muster up a contribution for his campaign.

  3. He didn’t talk about a national bank, but he certainly didn’t fit your silly stereotype either.

  4. Well, Cody Quirk, my philosophy which is based on what the Founding Fathers gave us via the Constitution, may be a “silly stereotype” to you and others like you, but I’m not surprised Mr. Fasano didn’t mention the creation of a National Bank and America’s right to print real US Currency – debt and interest free. For I’ve come to realize that you folks in the IAP and many other so-called “constitutionalist” 3rd parties are really “Republican-lite.” You all want to return to that Gilded Age when Big Business and Big Money controlled everything, and the common working people had to struggle and get by the best they could. But I have a feeling that the future generations of Americans -who are beginning to catch on that neither SOCIALISM or CAPITALISM is the answer, are going to one day read the Constitution, and if this Republic can be saved – they will save it. This is why I keep stressing the real issues though I know people like you refuse to listen.

  5. Well, the GOP rejects our message and we’re getting results in this state while whiny bitches like you only get on here and complain about it and do nothing.

    Our ideas don’t come from the Party of Dumbo. Rather its the other way around.

    You forget that this is Nevada- the solid majority of voters here, including me, don’t like the idea of government getting any bigger then it already is, especially when it comes to finances and banking.
    Even back in Andrew Jackson’s day, many Americans felt the same then as well.

    So how about you stick your foot where your mouth is, because compared to people like Janine Hansen, you’re nothing.

  6. With such “Christ-like” retorts as yours, I hardly know where to begin. “…the solid majority of voters here, including me, don’t like the idea of government getting any bigger then it already is, especially when it comes to finances and banking.”

    Okay, so you and the majority of Nevada voters would rather keep “paying interest to the private bankers through the nose?” Is that the kind of prosperity you would advocate for future generations? You need to do some more research on Andrew Jackson. He despised the private bankers of his day. He knew they were up to no good, as they only wanted economic control over the masses – just like most so-called Constitutionalists do today who defend the private banking system. But it’s a “free country.” Live in debt for the rest of your life, if you prefer to, or join with those of us who know we don’t have to.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.