Washington Secretary of State Proposes Mixed Revision of Ballot Access Laws

Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed plans to ask the legislature to revise Washington state procedures for ballot access for unqualified parties and independent candidates.

Currently, Washington state has a peculiar system that requires “conventions” of specified minimum numbers of voters in attendance, for independent candidates and the candidates of unqualified parties. These include 1,000 “attendees” for statewide office and down to 25 “attendees” for state legislature.

Since the state has always permitted outdoor “conventions”, in which anyone walking by who signs the roster is considered to be “attending”, this idea has long been rather silly. The Secretary of State proposes to give up the label “convention” and permit a straightforward petition. He proposes 1,000 signatures for statewide office, 500 for U.S. House, and 100 for state legislature and county office.

Unfortunately, he is also proposing to bring back the primary vote hurdle. Between 1978 and 2002, it wasn’t enough for independent candidates, and the candidates of unqualified parties, to show support at their own “conventions”. Such a showing of support only put them on the September primary ballot (except presidential candidates were exempt). Then they had to poll 1% in the September primary, as a condition of being on the November ballot. The September vote showing was held unconstitutional in 2004. A somewhat similar law was also struck down that year in Minnesota. Now Sam Reed proposes to bring it back, but with a smaller vote requirement (1,000 primary votes for statewide office, 500 for U.S. House, 100 for other partisan office).


Comments

Washington Secretary of State Proposes Mixed Revision of Ballot Access Laws — 2 Comments

  1. I was one of those affected. His plan was already required for me last year. I had to gather 100 “valid” signatures within a week. However, the plan now is to force us to gather these at one address
    on one day. They are also moving the week to one without tradition outdoor events. How do we love this? Let me count the ways!
    if it was just 100 signatures, no problem, but I needed 179, and made it by 3 signatures.
    Linde Knighton,
    Progressive Party

  2. How about letting the parties handle their own primary business, and just holding an IRV general?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.