Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Voting Rights Act Case

On April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in NAMUDNO v Holder, 08-322. The issue is the constitutionality of section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act, which requires local and state governments in part of the nation to submit election law changes to the U.S. Justice Department, before those changes can go into effect. Here is the AP story about the oral argument. UPDATE: here is the transcript, on the U.S. Supreme Court’s webpage. Thanks to Rick Hasen for that.


Comments

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Voting Rights Act Case — No Comments

  1. For any MORON folks —

    Each State happens to be an independent NATION-State as a result of the 4 July 1776 DOI.

    The U.S.A. regime is a *super-national* regime of/for the 50 NATION-States — regardless of ALL of the mystification of the Constitution since 1936.

  2. Why not make a push for the Voting Rights Amendment and the Civil Liberty Amenmdent? Getting people together behind something, rather then a few angry message board comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.