California Judge in American Independent Party Case Tentatively Rules that Defendants Have Been Served; Case Can Now Proceed to the Merits

On March 25, a California Superior Court Judge in Fairfield, Solano County, made a tentative procedural ruling in King v Robinson, the case involving the internal dispute inside the American Independent Party. The tentative ruling says the the Defendants (the Alan Keyes faction of the party) were properly served by a process server. Therefore, assuming the tentative ruling is made permanent tomorrow, the case can proceed to the merits of the dispute. UPDATE: the tentative decision was made permanent on March 26.

The tentative wording says, “Defendant’s motion to quash service of summons is denied. The court finds that proper service has been carried out pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 415.20. The evidence indicates that the process server attempted to serve Defendant by calling out his name and alerting him that he had legal documents to serve him and Defendant attempted to evade service by running into the house and slamming the door. Because service has been accomplished, the court has acquired personal jurisdiction over Defendant.”


Comments

California Judge in American Independent Party Case Tentatively Rules that Defendants Have Been Served; Case Can Now Proceed to the Merits — No Comments

  1. Markham was intentionally avoiding being served for the longest time.
    If he and Seidenberg have legal merit over their control of the AIP, then why avoid being served? Why not confront this head on?

  2. Cody – The answer is that Mark Robinson is a coward in addition to being an ultra corrupt liar.

    Stupid Don Lake – Our lawyer was always licensed to practice in California, You simply ( how your mind operates ) agreed with the ultra corrupt Mark Seidenberg ( birds of a feather ) in his lies that our lawyer was not licensed when he in fact has been licensed to practice in California for years. The ultra corrupt trio of Seidenberg, Robinson, and Noonan are totally desperate for anything which will save their corruption from being flushed down the toilet. Hence they throw anything and any lie, like the claim of an unlicensed attorney, against the wall and hope that it will stick. They do this since they know that when their corruption is exposed in open court they will be lucky to simply lose if not be arrested and taken to jail for their crimes. The end of these criminal liars and traitors is coming. Soon.

    Don J. Grundmann D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party

  3. Stupid Don Lake – Here on a completely different thread you bring up your stupidity. It is an excellent demonstration of what a fool you are. Nevertheless since you put your stupid/fool attack here I issue ( yet again ) my challenge; a challenge which you are obviously too stupid and lazy to take up and/or refute. Here it is ( yet again ) – Show how ONE, JUST ONE, biological cell ( inclusive of cell membrance, nucleus membrane, and DNA of the nucleus, plus all of the fantastic structures between the cell and nuclear membranes ) ” evolved.” As I stated on another thread you are simply the human equivalent of a parrot – reciting what you have been told with no thought for what it may be or any acucracy behind it. And that is yet one more demonstration of why you are stupid and a fool.

    Don J. Grundmann D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party

  4. TO: Don Lake
    I always thought thats before one had good service, one had to be touched with the papers being served. That is
    what I believed until yesterday. There was a dispute as
    to what AIPer John Sturdee of Fairfield, CA yelled outside Robinson home. Robinson asseverates that he did
    not hear AIP elector John Sturdee yell anything about
    legal papers through the door. All Robinson heard is
    the AIP elector John Sturdee yell his name through the
    door will he was inside his house.

    THREE DATE DONE Grundmann is wrong. The Brewtown Wisconsin lawyer that King used in this case is not a
    California lawyer. He has no California bar number.

    The Lawyer that is not admitted to the California Bar
    is Daniel Treuden (who claims to be the lawyer of James
    C. King) in KING v. ROBINSON. Daniel Treuden is a
    lawyer with a Wisconson Bar number of 1052766. To act
    as an attorney in California from out of state in a
    California case one has to be admitted to the California
    Bar or act with a Pro Hac Vise approval of the Court.
    Wisconson Lawyer Daniel Treuden did no have approval from the court to act for James C. King at the Case Management Conference # One of February 3, 2010.

    At the proceedings of February 3, 2010, Judge William C.
    Harrison of the Solano County Superior Court “continued
    this case management conference over to that same date,
    March 26th, for hearing on the motion to quash.” During
    the continued case management conference # one of March
    26, 2010, I raised the issue of the Unauthorized Practice of Law (UPL)of Mr. King’s Wisconson’s attorney with Judge Harrison. Since Mr. Gary Kreep was not present at the case management conference (because of a overload of COURTCALL phone spaces) the issue of
    of referral to Judge McCoy (under Business & Professions Code section 6126.3(B)) of the Wisconson Lawyer of James King could not go forward at that hearing. When the CMC has its next continued hearing the issues of the UPL (with attorney Gary Kreep present) should be going forward at to the referral of the Brewtown, WI lawyer to Judge McCoy’s assigment to an additional judge for UPL proceeding.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American
    Independent Party.

    a

  5. ” I always thought thats before one had good service, one had to be touched with the papers being served. That is what I believed until yesterday.”

    Response – The statement of a true liar and, as with his fellow liar Mark Robinson, a true coward. If the Robinson, Seidenberg, Noonan rat liar claims of their legitimacy to their stolen positions was accurate and factual why then do they run like the dogs that they are from legal service? They could have eagerly taken any legal challenge months ago and, IF THEY WERE TELLING THE TRUTH, they could have accepted the King challenge to their corruption and defeated it quickly and easily. Instead, LIKE THE COWARDS AND LIARS THAT THEY ARE, they literally RUN from legal document service. That really tells you all that you need to know regarding their claims of being legitimate in their actions. Their desperation to grab at any straw to save their total corruption from being exposed and flushed down the toilet is truly, as they individually are, ultra pathetic. The ultra corrupt rodent Seidenberg bleating on about ” unauthorized practice of law ” shows how utterly terrified the rats are of ARGUING THE CASE ON ITS MERITS as they instead dream up any and all technicalities, no matter how small or stupid, in their desperate attempt to save their corruption from its inevitable end. And here is their champion, their so-called ” chairman,” Mark ” The Rat ” Robinson, cowering in his rat hole and not even daring to come to the hearing while at the same time, as the most corrupt candidate for the office in the history of our state if not the nation, claiming to campaign for Governor. I will personally be exposing his cowardice, ratness, and corruption to the AIP voters of the state. He will be slaughtered in the primary. And then the REAL AIP, the non-and anti-corruption faction of the party, will flush the 3 Rats down the toilet to the sewers of history where they so richly belong.

    Don J. Grundmann D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party

  6. Follow-up to Don Lake,
    I now have your shirt size. I have the permission from the AIP candidate for U S Senate to give you one
    of our new American Independent Party shirts with the
    new party color in blue. I had a meeting with Edward C. Noonan last Friday.

    In post # 3 it is stated that “Our lawyer was always licensed practice in California”. To practice in California one needs to be admitted first to the California Bar. Wisconson lawyer Daniel Treuden has never been admitted to the bar in California. So we
    have a person running for Lt. Governor that hired a
    foreign lawyer named Daniel Treuden to UPL in California
    in violation of Business & Professions section 6126.

    I find it interesting that any one could say someone was
    “alway licensed to practice in California” law. Therefore, according to Grundmann it must be a birth
    right in California to practice law. How stupid is that?

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party

  7. The evil Mark Seidenrat continues on with his lies regarding being licensed to practice. This when Attorney Robert Bernhoft is representing the REAL AIP, the non-corruption faction, against the corruption side of Seidenrat and MarkRat Robinson. Seidenberg, as in every other lie that he continually spews out, tried to claim that because Daniel Treuden made a comment duing a conference call on the case that the case should be thrown out because he was not licensed to practice law!! The Judge was not swayed by his psychotic rambling. Add that to his comment above regarding legal service only being completed when the papers ” touch ” the person being served and anyone can see 1) how totally desperate Rat Robinson and Seidenberg are to find anything possible, no matter low fraudulent, to stop the case, and 2) how fearful they are of an actual hearing. They known that a true hearing will expose how utterly corrupt that they are and that as a result the true AIP of Chairman King will win and stop their treasonous corruption. The hearing on Friday just brings more to the surface the treasonous evil of Ratbinson and Seidenrat.

    Don J. Grundmann D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party

  8. Cody Quirk in answer to your post # 9.

    There will be three hearings on August 13, 2010.

    Also, I was talking in regard to the Unauthorized Practice
    of Law under the California Business & Professions Code
    section 6126 the issue of more than one call via COURTCALL to Judge Harrison during the February 3, 2010
    [note no conference call as Dr. Don Grundmann asseverated in the disinformation post above] Case Management Conference One had only lawyer Treuden speaking of the Wisconsin Bar. King should know better than that and help the lawyers in this State of California with full employment in place of hiring a foreign lawyer to do UPL legal work.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg

  9. Cody – Notice that SeidenRat still hangs on to his desperate idea of unauthorized practice. He can’t, and won’t discuss the issues of how he and MarkRat Robinson got to their claimed positions of control within the party because he knows the criminal actions they did to achieve their ” victory.” Now they are ever more desperate as their neverending attempts to keep the truth from being exposed are failing.

    Don J. Grundmann D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party

  10. TO: Cody Quirk,

    In a letter dated January 26, 2010, from Noel Hojnacki, it shows that James King was aware that Daniel J. Treuden (who is not a member of the California State Bar) was engaged in the Unauthorized Practice of Law
    [see Business & Professions code sections 6125, 6126,
    and 6127]. Why would James King hire an foreign attorney from Brewtown to represent him in a California case? Is there a running practice of Mr. King on knowingly using foreign attorneys in California cases?
    In King v. Bowen back in 2008, he tried to obtain a foreign law firm in Las Vegas, NV to use in that case.
    Then he ended up with The Bernhoft Law Firm with an office in Los Angeles County and foreign lawyers.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American
    Independent Party

  11. To: Cody Quirk,

    In KING v. ROBINSON a demurrer to the complaint was filed by Chairman of AIP. Hearing is now set for August
    25, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 2, Solano County Superior Court, Fairfield, CA. A motion to change
    venue will be heard also on August 25, 2010 at the same
    time and location.

    Have you ever visited Fairfax, CA? My understand is Fairfax, CA is in Marin County.

    What do you think of the idea of having the AIP convention for 2010 in Sacramento on the 4th of July
    weekend? Will there be “Firework”!

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.