The Associated Press has this story about the oral argument on April 28 in Doe v Reed, the case over whether Washington state should release the names and addresses of people who sign petitions. UPDATE: here is the transcript of the oral argument. It is 73 pages, including the index.

UPDATE: Here is Tom Goldstein’s prediction, that the Court will rule that signatures should be withheld when there is a likelihood that signers will be injured in some way if their names and addresses are made public. Goldstein writes for Scotusblog.