U.S. District Court in Virginia Hears Libertarian Party Case on Residency of Petition Circulators

On September 10, U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema heard arguments in Libertarian Party of Virginia v Virginia State Board of Elections, 1:10-cv-615, eastern district.  The issue is whether Virginia may require all petition circulators for U.S. House candidates to be residents of the district.  In this case, the petitioner is the candidate himself, Matt Mosley.  He doesn’t live in the 8th district, but that is the district he is running in.  The U.S. Constitution does not require candidates for U.S. House to live in the district they are seeking to represent.

A similar Virginia case, before another judge, already lost in U.S. District Court in a different division of the eastern district.  That case is Lux v Rodrigues.  That case also involves a candidate who circulated his own petition, and in which all those signatures were disqualified because the candidate, Herb Lux, doesn’t live in the district he hopes to represent.  That case is already before the 4th circuit, Lux v Rodrigues, 10-1997.  On September 15, the 4th circuit refused to order the State Board of Elections to check the Lux petition to see if it was actually signed by as many as 1,000 registered voters (the legal requirement for U.S. House candidates in Virginia is 1,000 signatures).  The 4th circuit order is not signed by any particular judge and has no text explaining the basis for the denial.


Comments

U.S. District Court in Virginia Hears Libertarian Party Case on Residency of Petition Circulators — 3 Comments

  1. Office Election Area – ELECTORS-VOTERS residing in THAT Area.

    Everbody else is an ALIEN — from political outer space.

    Too much for the MORON courts to understand.

    ANY petitions required for ballot access in 1776-1791 ???

  2. Let the voter decide. If a candidate doesn’t live in the area which is electing the representative, then expose it.

    It’s called free speech.

    Anybody know where we can find that these days? I’m still searching, not finding it.

    And still trying to create a space for free speech.
    Where’s good?

  3. “James O. Ogle Says:
    September 16th, 2010 at 11:56 am
    Let the voter decide. If a candidate doesn’t live in the area which is electing the representative, then expose it.”

    This case in not about the candidates, it is about the petition signature gatherers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.