On December 28, the same three judges who ruled against the Libertarian Party of Massachusetts on November 16, refused to reconsider their ruling, in Barr v Galvin, 09-2426. This is the case over whether an unqualified party can use a stand-in presidential candidate on its petition, and then have the stand-in later withdraw and be replaced by the actual presidential nominee.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
MA – remember 19 Apr 1775.
Separate is not equal — even in super-liberal Mass.
Brown v Bd of Ed 1954
Even though Dem Rep makes good points, could we please ban him from Ballot Access News? Oh wait, that is COMPLETELY anti-libertarian…
How about banning the many libertarian or even not libertarian juveniles with their juvenile comments from B.A.N. ???
Attention juveniles — All election stuff now is a matter of LIFE or DEATH — due to the EVIL lurking in the EVIL brains of the party hack control freak gerrymander incumbents in ALL States and especially in the gerrymander Congress.