Comments

South Dakota Bill Would Allow Americans Elect to Remove Itself from 2014 Ballot — No Comments

  1. Since South Dakota has party registration, it would be simpler to have recognition based on a minimal number of registrants (say 100), along with a minimal level of activity (such as in Florida) to maintain active status.

    That way, there would be a clear understanding as to who has the right to speak on behalf of the party; and if the party officials failed to maintain an active status, the registrants could reorganize a dormant party.

    In reality, the South Dakota Americans Elect party did not did successfully petition in 2012, because there was never really a group of South Dakota voters organized as the party. The “South Dakota Americans Elect” party was a PO Box and bank account in Washington, DC.

  2. #1, I agree with you. For some time I have been suggesting to the South Dakota Libertarian Party that it seek a sponsor for a bill to define a “political party” as a group with at least 1,000 registered voters.

  3. There were only 330,000 votes cast in South Dakota total. 1,000 is actually a pretty big number.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>