Ohio Bill to Put Choice of Political Party, or Independent Status, on Voter Registration Forms

On October 16, two Ohio Representatives introduced HB 305, which would change voter registration forms. Current Ohio forms do not ask the applicant to choose a party, or to choose independent status. The bill would put that question on voter registration forms.

The bill may have been introduced to clear up the ongoing ambiguity in Ohio election law over who can qualify as an independent candidate. Current law says an independent candidate is anyone who submits a valid petition and who does not consider himself or herself a member of a qualified party. But Ohio courts have made a muddle of this law, and have established precedents that the way to determine if someone considers himself or herself an independent is to delve into the candidate’s behavior and associations.

If the bill passed, it would take effect January 1, 2017. The voter registration form would include a blank line, for the purpose of letting a voter register into a party that had not been qualified when that form had been printed. However, it appears the authors of the bill did not intend to let voters register into unqualified parties. The bill does not address whether a qualified party that goes off the ballot still retains its registered members, nor does it address whether parties can choose to invite registered independents to vote in its primaries.

The bill would require a candidate in a primary to have registered into that particular party at least 30 days before the deadline to get on the primary ballot. Voters could change party affiliation at any time, except that they could not change party membership at the polls on primary day or within 30 days of a primary. Someone who wants to be an independent candidate could apparently switch to independent status the very day of filing the independent candidate petition. If this bill were enacted, it would clearly make it easier for anyone to qualify as an independent candidate. The authors of the bill are Representative Paul Becker (R-Union Township) and Representative Ron Hood (R-Ashville).

The bill would make it somewhat more difficult for an individual to get on a primary ballot, because the only individuals who could sign a primary petition would be registered members of that party. Currently, a primary petition can be signed by individuals who didn’t vote in the last primary or individuals who voted in the last primary in that same party, which is a bigger pool of potential signers. Here is the text of the bill. Thanks to Kevin Knedler for the news about the bill.


Comments

Ohio Bill to Put Choice of Political Party, or Independent Status, on Voter Registration Forms — No Comments

  1. Where is that MODEL ELECTION L-A-W — with the various options ???

    ALL party hack registration lists are PURGE lists – when, NOT if, things get really rough and tough

    — as in 1775-1783 or 1861-1865.

    See the Hitler purge in 1934 (Night of the Long Knives) and the Stalin purges in 1936-1939 (mass murder of old commies and the Red Army, etc.)


    P.R. and nonpartisan App.V. — NO party hack registration lists.

  2. It’s difficult to have a model election law that fits all 50 states, because the states have such different traditions about election practices. One of the most glaring is that some states have very early primaries (Texas and Illinois have all their partisan primaries in March) whereas others have them in September (Massachusetts’ 2014 primary is set for Sep. 16, 2014).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.