No Mention of Voting Rights, or Voting Problems, in Two-Hour Democratic Presidential Debate

The October 13 Democratic presidential debate held in Las Vegas was two hours long, but not one minute was devoted to voting rights, or problems with voting practices. This is somewhat surprising, because Democrats have been vocal about some voting rights problems. In 1984 the Democratic National Convention passed a resolution that said, “Be it further resolved that the Democratic Party of the United States recognizes the right to vote as the most fundamental of all rights in our democracy. And no duty of the Party is more important than protecting the sanctity of this right.”

Of course, part of the blame for the absence of voting in the debate is that the moderators didn’t choose to ask about the issue. The United States is the only nation in the world that holds elections and yet denies a voting representative for citizens who live in the national capital. The United States is the only nation in the world that prevents persons from voting because they committed a crime in the past. The United States is the only nation considered free and democratic that has general election ballots that, by law, only contain two candidates. The United States is the only nation in the world that has an overseas territory of more than 500,000 people that has no voting representation in the national legislature. The United States is the only nation that holds a popular election for head of government and permits the person who polled the most votes to fail to take the office, whereas the person who polls the second-highest number of votes can sometimes take the office.

There are other voting rights problems as well. The Republican presidential debates of August and September 2015 didn’t mention voting rights problems either.


Comments

No Mention of Voting Rights, or Voting Problems, in Two-Hour Democratic Presidential Debate — 1 Comment

  1. But campaign finance reform was discussed, and until campaign finance is reformed in this country, focusing on ballot access by third party candidates is like scratching a small pox sore…it might feel good, but it does nothing to cure the disease that’s killing the patient.

    Public financing of elections is a fine idea, but inserting that into our current system without eliminating Super PACS, inter-campaign transfers, enduring “campaign war chests,” etc. only adds more swill to this cesspool we’ve allowed to form. Eliminate those factors, and freer ballot access will be a natural consequence of a campaign finance system that better represents a truly democratic process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.