Three California Minor Party or Independent Lawsuits Now Pending in Ninth Circuit

The Ninth Circuit has three California cases filed by minor parties or independent candidates. Soltysik v Padilla, 16-55758, challenges state law that won’t let members of unqualified parties have their party label on ballots, if they are running for Congress or partisan state office. That case is moving slowly and no briefs have been filed. The plaintiff is a registered Socialist.

De La Fuente v Padilla, 16-56261, is an appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction. It challenges the law that requires an independent presidential candidate to collect 178,039 valid signatures in 105 days. The court has already determined that the case is not suitable for mediation, and briefs will probably be filed soon, although no matter what happens, it is unlikely that the 2016 ballot will be affected.

Independent Party v Padilla, 16-15895, challenges a decision by the Secretary of State that the Independent Party cannot become a political body because its name is so similar to the American Independent Party, which is already on the ballot. The Independent Party’s opening brief was filed on August 25, 2016.


Comments

Three California Minor Party or Independent Lawsuits Now Pending in Ninth Circuit — 3 Comments

  1. How many parties having *Socialist* in their names on any ballot in the USA since 1776 ???

    ANY difference between same adjectives and same nouns ???

  2. Demo Rep there is a huge difference. For example the Judean People’s Front is a completely different group than the People’s Front of Judea. One group are freedom fighters and the other are wankers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.