Eighth Circuit Likely to Hear “Disobedient Presidential Electors” Case in February 2018

Three federal lawsuits are still pending on the question of whether presidential electors are free to vote for any person who meets the constitutional qualifications, or whether states can dictate whom they must vote for. The Minnesota case is now pending in the Eighth Circuit, and the oral argument will probably be in February 2018. Abdurrahman v Dayton, 16-4551. The plaintiff, a Democratic presidential elector, was expelled from the state’s meeting of presidential electors in December 2016. He lost in U.S. District Court; that court refused to allow a trial or the presentation of any evidence. The real issue now, in the Eighth Circuit, is whether the U.S. District Court should have permitted evidence.


Comments

Eighth Circuit Likely to Hear “Disobedient Presidential Electors” Case in February 2018 — 1 Comment

  1. Const Amdt —

    Abolish the minority rule gerrymander Electoral College — a late DARK AGE scheme from Hell.

    Uniform definition of Elector-Voter in ALL of the USA – including DC and occupied areas/colonies.

    PR and AppV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.