Federal Lawsuit Over Georgia’s Vote-Counting Machines Attracts Prominent Law Firms on Both Sides

Last year, some Georgia voters filed a federal lawsuit against Georgia’s Secretary of State, alleging that the state’s vote-counting machines, which have no paper audit trail, are inherenty unreliable. Recently the plaintiffs received the assistance of some of the nation’s most prominent law firms. See this story.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg will probably soon allow a trial, in which the machines will be brought into court and experts on both sides will discuss how they work and how they could perhaps provide a dishonest count. The case is Curling v Kemp, n.d., 1:17cv-2989. Garland Favorito, a leader of the Constitution Party, is one of the plaintiffs.


Comments

Federal Lawsuit Over Georgia’s Vote-Counting Machines Attracts Prominent Law Firms on Both Sides — 3 Comments

  1. Watch the video where a paper ballot vote count is conducted on Earth Day, April 22nd, the vote count in video is under pure proportional representation (PPR).

    The California Green, American Independent Parties, the national Libertarian Parties and Google don’t want you to know and they have bullied, deleted and viciously slandered our team to make sure you don’t know about the United Coalition:

    https://youtu.be/DgXaC_Uzm6s

  2. What DEVIL F***S approved any voting machine with NO paper trail ???

    The Same DFS who loved Stalin and Hitler in the 1930s ???

    — or who merely took one more BRIBE in one more rotted southern State regime ???

    Revive the 1864-1865 Sherman Union Army NOW ???

  3. What other basic records are on machines with NO paper trails —

    Birth records ???
    Real estate records ???
    Voter registrations ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.