Democratic Candidates for U.S. House in Three California Districts Have Spent $24 Million So Far

Spending for Democratic candidates in the three California U.S. House districts that have Republican members of Congress, but which voted for Hillary Clinton in November 2016, is now at $24,000,000, according to this story. Two-thirds of that total is the candidate’s own money. The three districts are the 39th, 48th, and 49th.


Comments

Democratic Candidates for U.S. House in Three California Districts Have Spent $24 Million So Far — 3 Comments

  1. According to the records provided by CA SoS, the three Congressional districts #s 39, 48 and 49, have 16 candidates each, and of those 48 names, ten names are female names. (Less than 20%)

    Nine of the 48 names, for the three Congressional districts #s 39, 48 and 49, are not Ds or Rs. (Less than 20%)

    The percentage of candidates with female names, and the percent of non-Ds/Rs are both under 20%, or one in five.

    The good news, is that the female and non-Ds/Rs can win should the voting be collaborative with the United Coalition California, because the non-Rs/Ds and female candidates are fewer and far between so we suffer less from the “split vote problem”.

    Our team can win (the females and the non-Rs/Ds) once our team starts working together and collaborating.

    Instead the uncooperative team players are looking at the money totals.

    Unity is free. Information on unity is free. We like the free information, and the free write-in names, so we need to report on our team and not so much about money being spent which has nothing to do with our teamwork.

    The United Coalition has been reporting on the unity phenomena of pure proportional representation (PPR) for more than twenty-three consecutive years and PPR works fine.

    United Coalition California
    http://www.usparliament.org/ss11.php

  2. The USA GDP will pass a mere 20 TRILLION (annual rate) in 2018 Quarter 2 — more to LOOT by the gerrymander gangsters.

    The WAR between NET Tax Payers (aka Tax Slaves) (around 60-55 pct) vs NET Tax Getters (aka Tax Looters) (around 40-45 pct) gets worse and worse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.