On August 15, James R. Adams filed his brief in the Third Circuit in Adams v Carney, 18-1045. This is the lawsuit over the Delaware requirement that all state court judges must be members of a major party. In Delaware, a “major party” is defined as a party that has registration of at least 5% of the state total. Adams is an independent. He won his lawsuit in U.S. District Court, and the state is appealing. Delaware does not have elections for judicial office. Judges are appointed.
In Const order–
1. Super-danger violation of NO Title of Nobility in 1-10 —
NO special *rights* for 1 or more political classes.
2. Anther perversion of the 1 Amdt– due to earlier SCOTUS perversions.
3. BLATANT subversion of EPC in 14-1.
Way too many INCOMPETENT lawyers doing constitutional law election cases (AND the much worse judges in such cases)
— ever since 14 Amdt in 1868 — 150 years and counting.
NO *original* thinking — just more trying to split more JUNK SCOTUS opinion hairs.
Men, we have a good plan for making elections fair for women under pure proportional representation (PPR) and that is to bring levels to 50/50 balance everywhere.
We do that by ranking our opposite gender ahead of ourselves with consecutively alternating ranked genders thereafter.
Once we reach balance then we ask women to reciprocate by considering to rank their own opposite gender ahead of their own.
Then we continue into perpetuity.
The 8th California Super-state Parliament is setting the example for national elections in 2020.
http://www.usparliament.org/ss11.php
James Ogle, if you didn’t spam the page constantly with this, I might have seriously considered your proposal. Now, no chance.
Vote for whom you wish and we accept the results.
And when you want to participate with our team under the mathematics of PPR then we happily welcome you back.
Also- voter elections of ALL judges via nonpartisan AppV — pending Condorcet.