New Mexico Holds Three-Party U.S. Senate Debate

On October 12, the three New Mexico candidates for U.S. Senate debated each other. See this story. They are the nominees of the Democratic, Libertarian and Republican Parties.


Comments

New Mexico Holds Three-Party U.S. Senate Debate — 16 Comments

  1. We understand that there are many males out there who don’t want 50/50 partnership with both genders in all elections, and that their interests are satisfied by only males for President and Vice President as has been the case in 1776.

    The United Coalition USA insists that we bring female options in all cases and that single winner elections and decision items must end.

    No more black Vs white, to see who is best, but not inclusion and both win, and find agreement as diverse minds.

  2. Ideas matter. Beliefs matter. Whether those ideas come from women or men regardless of race or religion or national origin or sexual orientation it the ideas that count. Reverse racism is still racism. Reverse sexism is still sexism.

  3. James Ogle – 20% of elected US House and Senate members are women because women make up 20% of US House and Senate candidates. The percentage elected is virtually identical to the percentage who run. Actually, the percentage elected is higher than the percentage who run. Only 16% of federal candidates in 2016 were women, but 20% of Congress is female.

    Women also only make up 30% of political contributors.

    There’s no discrimination going on. Women are just less likely to want to get actively involved in politics.

    And the much touted “surge” in female candidates this year is mostly hype. There are also a greater number of men running. Which means only 23% of federal candidates this year are women. Expect about that percentage to be elected.

  4. Abolish the minority rule USA Senate

    — with its many blowhard party HACKS from below average small States

    — ie *provincial* HACKS.

    PR and AppV

  5. Jim, the reason why women stay out of politics, is because in pluralistic elections, fighting makes you stronger.

    Now there is a better way, it’s working together makes us stronger, so now there is no need to fight gender equality which is only possible under pure proportional representation.

    You go ahead a fight the United Coalition USA and we turn and walk away. We’re working with team players and not single-winner power grabbing chauvinists, ego-maniacs and psychopaths, like you who are attracted and defend the males winning 100% of the time since 1776 in all POTUS elections.

    Only pure proportional representation (PPR) can give us fair elections mathematicallt, not wishful thinking that you bring.

  6. What can you do? The Greater Male Variability Hypothesis dictates that men always dominate the very top – AND BOTTOM – of every population curve. Perfect proportionality would require than men have an edge at the highest – and lowest – levels of any human activity anyway.

  7. How many regimes with ONE male-ONE female top equal military commanders in world history —

    aka commander(s)-in-chief ???

    IE who gives the order for Doomsday — launch all nukes ???

    the CIC male, the CIC female, both ???

    — trust computers ??? HA HA — See the Terminator movies series.

  8. James Ogle “You go ahead a fight the United Coalition USA and we turn and walk away.”

    OK. We’re all fighting you and you’re spam. Now go away.

  9. There was a major Silicon Valley company – I think it was Google – that decided to make hiring as objective as possible by using a computer to process job applications. They discontinued this project when they noticed that over time the computer itself favored male applicants.

  10. Everyone, we’re asking men to consider voting for our opposite gender ahead of our own, and we do this with great success, because all our election districts (including President and Vice President) are two-member districts and bigger.

    This is voluntary, and of course their may not be enough female candidates to rank many, but those considered would be the first to get a vote or near the first in cases where men decline to put women ahead a men.

    This is team-building between men and women and if women like it then they may also reciprocate.

    Other parties will steal our ideas and make it appear, or make it hard facts, that they will rank opposite gender #1 with consecutively ranked alternating genders thereafter because this is solid strategy.

    For chauvinists to continually look for lame excuses to not bring our opposite gender ahead of our own with consecutively ranked alternating genders thereafter is expected.

    But for men who want to bring cooperation fast, we need to not delay, and bring the message of good cooperation with women to the forefront ASAP.

    Women may not give us the time of day, they may win elections (I have lost to women while promoting this) but the long run benefits have always proven to me that this is spot on.

    We don’t need men dissing the unity and saying that they cannot unite with the team for pure proportional representation (PPR) Electoral College.

    Men have won President and Vice President 100% of the time since 1776.

    It’s time for a new message besides “I am better than everyone” like Stein and Johnson in 2012 and 2016.

    The United Coalition USA has a new plan and it’s not built for ego-maniacs, concurred psychopaths, neither men nor women.

    Our team is for the humble, who put the team before themselves and before their own gender.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.