Free and Equal Uses Arbitration Against UCLA for Cancelling 2014 Mass Rally

Free and Equal Elections, which has sponsored general election presidential debates for candidates excluded from the “big” debates, is set for an arbitration process against UCLA. Free and Equal had a contract with UCLA to use the Pauley Pavilion for its May 2014 rally. The rally’s purpose was to expand interest in political participation among young people. The event included many big-name musical and other entertainers, including “Public Enemy”, and thousands of tickets were sold. A few days before the event, UCLA revoked the contract.

The arbitration process starts on June 24, 2019, and will last up to five days, with witnesses.


Comments

Free and Equal Uses Arbitration Against UCLA for Cancelling 2014 Mass Rally — 5 Comments

  1. Mere 5 plus years to get judicial action ???

    ALL contracts now merely advisory/contingent ???

    ABOLISH *arbitration* with its super time delays.

    MORE judges and courts — with perhaps less time delays ???

  2. Public Enemy? Entertainers? Will they still be doing their song about assassinating the Governor of Arizona?

  3. Our team supports the effort by Free and Equal Foundation to seek justice for the unfair treatment, particularly when it was a just cause if free speech access for third parties and independents.

    The United Coalition wishes them success in this lengthy process to find justice in being wronged while nurturing an environment for free speech.

    Free speech liberties are a rare luxury in our world and every moment must be protected at all cost.

  4. Hah! Justice delayed is justice denied. Plain and simple. The US system of elections is a fraud. Ballot access and free speech issues like campaign finance laws are no different than Jim Crow laws meant to keep the duopoly in power. F&E is delusional if they think they will get a fair shake by “the system”. The courts cover for the duopoly which returns the favor by appointing the judges for life. The term “kangaroo court” doesn’t even begin to describe the immorality and corruption of the US court system as applied to elections.

    A very easy start for fixing the system would be to require the same number of petition signatures for EVERY candidate whose name is to be printed on the general election ballot.

  5. DW –

    The term “LAWLESS TYRANT courts” begins to describe the immorality and corruption of the US court system as applied to elections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.