All Four Lawsuits Challenging At-Large System for Electing Presidential Electors Have Lost in U.S. District Courts; All Four are Being Appealed

All four of the lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of at-large election of presidential electors have lost in U.S. District Court. All four are being appealed. All four had been filed in 2018 by David Boies, the well-known attorney who argued Bush v Gore for Al Gore in the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000.

The California case, Rodriguez v Brown, lost on September 21,2018 in U.S. District Court, and is now being appealed to the Ninth Circuit, where it is case 18-56281. The final brief is due May 1.

The Massachusetts case, Lynn v Baker, lost in U.S. District Court on December 7, 2018. In the First Circuit it is case 18-2235.

The Texas case, League of United Latin American Citizens v Abbott, lost on February 25, 2019. In the Fifth Circuit it is case 19-50214.

The South Carolina case, Baten v McMaster, lost on March 8, 2019. In the Fourth Circuit it is case 19-1297.

These cases are very difficult to win, because many decades ago, similar cases had lost and one of those decisions was summarily affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court.


Comments

All Four Lawsuits Challenging At-Large System for Electing Presidential Electors Have Lost in U.S. District Courts; All Four are Being Appealed — 2 Comments

  1. Related to the attacks on at large voting for legislators (in local regimes) and judges in many States.

    Obvious Scheme – to get more Prez EC gerrymander areas – esp in Elephant States — esp to beat Trump in 2020.

    PR and AppV

  2. SCOTUS summary affirms do NOT mean too much any more.

    Only slightly above Cert Denys.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.