Twenty-Two States Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Electors Case and to Rule Against Elector Freedom

On November 20, twenty-two states filed an amicus brief in Colorado Department of State v Baca, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case and rule in favor of the state of Colorado.

The brief says that the voters did not elect Michael Baca, the Colorado presidential elector who was replaced in December 2016 when he refused to vote for Hillary Clinton.  This is not a true statement.  The Colorado November 2016 ballot said, “Vote for presidential electors”, and then listed the various presidential candidates.

Ironically, this brief was organized by the Attorney General of South Dakota, and South Dakota is one of the few states that prints the names of presidential elector candidates on its November ballot.  They are listed underneath the name of the presidential candidate that they are pledged to.

The states that signed this brief are Alaska, Arizona, California, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Presumably the authors of the amicus asked each state to sign, so it is interesting that 28 states did not sign, nor the did government of the District of Columbia.


Comments

Twenty-Two States Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Electors Case and to Rule Against Elector Freedom — 1 Comment

  1. How many States DEMANDING an Art V convention to repeal ALL the ANTI-Democracy ROT in the USA and State Consts ???

    — IE – USA Senate, EC, lack of elected USA Judges, lack of nonpartisan elected USA Marshals and Dist Attys, etc.


    PR and AppV and TOTSOP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.