On November 27, a U.S. District Court in New Hampshire sent questions to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, in Casey v New Hampshire Secretary of State, 1:19cv-149. The case concerns a 2018 law that is not clear. It relates to who can register to vote in New Hampshire. It can be interpreted to mean that college students attending college in New Hampshire cannot register and vote in New Hampshire, if they have drivers licenses and car registrations in other states. Here is the rather long and complicated referral to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
Meanwhile the SOS & AG are saying this new law doesn’t affect who is allowed to register to vote.
Federal IDs would resolve this. If a person changes their domicile, they change the address on their ID.
State election officials would be notified since it would be required to use federal ID’s for federal elections. It would be equivalent to AVR.
New Hampshire should be able to tax vehicles used primarily in the state.
***NOT clear*** laws = void for vagueness — by definition.
NOT all States have the Fed certified questions process to State supremes ???
How about ONLY NONPARTISAN State courts and SCOTUS — ALL elected ???
14-1 first sentence — All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
1866-1868 RESIDE.
https://www.nh.gov/glance/bill-of-rights.htm
NH Const
Part 1, Bill of Rights, of the New Hampshire State Constitution.
[Art.] 11. [Elections and Elective Franchises.
[[[spaces between sentences added for clarity]]]
All elections are to be free, and every inhabitant of the state of 18 years of age and upwards shall have an equal right to vote in any election.
Every person shall be considered an inhabitant for the purposes of voting in the town, ward, or unincorporated place where he has his domicile.
[[[ 14-1 RESIDE = NH ***inhabitant*** / ***domicile*** ??? ]]]
[[[ NOOO mention of *****citizen***** in the section ]]]
No person shall have the right to vote under the constitution of this state who has been convicted of treason, bribery or any willful violation of the election laws of this state or of the United States; but the supreme court may, on notice to the attorney general, restore the privilege to vote to any person who may have forfeited it by conviction of such offenses.
The general court shall provide by law for voting by qualified voters who at the time of the biennial or state elections, or of the primary elections therefor, or of city elections, or of town elections by official ballot, are absent from the city or town of which they are inhabitants, or who by reason of physical disability are unable to vote in person, in the choice of any officer or officers to be elected or upon any question submitted at such election.
Voting registration and polling places shall be easily accessible to all persons including disabled and elderly persons who are otherwise qualified to vote in the choice of any officer or officers to be elected or upon any question submitted at such election.
The right to vote shall not be denied to any person because of the non payment of any tax.
Every inhabitant of the state, having the proper qualifications, has equal right to be elected into office.
—-
June 2, 1784
Amended 1903 to provide that in order to vote or be eligible for office a person must be able to read the English language and to write.
Amended 1912 to prohibit those convicted of treason, bribery or willfull violation of the election laws from voting or holding elective office.
Amended 1942 to provide for absentee voting in general elections.
Amended 1956 to provide for absentee voting in primary elections.
Amended 1968 to provide right to vote not denied because of nonpayment of taxes. Also amended in 1968 to delete an obsolete phrase.
Amended 1976 to reduce voting age to 18.
Amended 1984 to provide accessibility to all registration and polling places.
oddly enough only 1 state gives gay americans equal voting rights in the constitution.
Also – each State remains a NATION-STATE —
BASIC Citizen/Allegiance stuff.
Last para of 4 July 1776 DOI.
Various test oaths / PURGES in 1775-onward regarding adult inhabitants and what allegiance they had — to NEW State regimes or OLDE Brit King G III.
OLDE common law – only allegiance regime folks could own land in regime — various SCOTUS cases – 1783 USA-UK Peace Treaty.
Demo Rep
nope. you are mistaken.
Besides DOI —
1777 Art Confed
1783 USA-Brit Peace Treaty
1787 USA Const Art VII plus various nation-state stuff in 1-10 and Art 4.
States – all plural in such 4 BASIC documents.
Ongoing subversion of all States via SCOTUS HACKS — with their SUBVERSION ops
— esp about 1-8 general welfare cl and interstate commerce cl.
Result – States almost DEAD — see US Code Title 42
Thus — the worse and worse TYRANT MONARCH USA Prezs – esp since 1993 –
arrogant flippant P-U-N-K Prezs – Clinton, Bush II, Obama, Trump.
—
PR and AppV and TOTSOP
There are extremely a lot of details prefer that take into consideration. That is the fantastic point to start up. I provide you with the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly you will discover questions just like the one you start up the location where the most essential thing might be in honest good faith. I don?t determine if guidelines have emerged around stuff like that, but I am sure that your chosen job is clearly referred to as an affordable game. Both little ones notice the impact of a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.