Michael Feinstein has this op-ed in Fox and Hounds Daily, making the case that the California Citizens Redistricting Commission ought to include at least one member from a party other than the Republican and Democratic Parties.
Michael Feinstein has this op-ed in Fox and Hounds Daily, making the case that the California Citizens Redistricting Commission ought to include at least one member from a party other than the Republican and Democratic Parties.
NOOOO gerrymander commissions – full of liars re party connections.
PR
The editorial is incorrect in that it lumps voters registered with other “non-qualified” parties in with NPP voters. California statute makes no such distinction, and neither does the selection panel.
@DR,
How so with respect to party affiliation?
JR – not clear
undercover Donkeys now have a Bolshevik tendency to LIE re their party connections
— goes back to Lenin commies in 1905-1917 in Russia.
@DR,
California requires non-changing party affiliation for 5 years.
Are you suggesting that they are deep plants?
JR —
YES — DEEP plants —
see such liars getting on the 2011 CA gerrymander commission.
Results – Elephants near extinction in CA.
@DR,
Could you be more specific about California?
See sites like ballotopedia and wiki about the 2011-2012 CA gerrymander commission members.
Some detail stuff was mentioned many months/years ago on BAN.
@DR,
Nothing there that supports your claim that some commissioners were sleeper agents.