On August 20, the Colorado Supreme Court agreed to hear Bedrooms are for People v City of Boulder. The city of Boulder told proponents of a local initiative that they needed 4,048 signatures by August 5, 2020. But on July 10, the city changed its mind, and said the deadline was June 21 and that 8,096 signatures are needed. The proponents sued in state court, but lost in the trial court. Here is the opening brief.
Moron courts have perverted DP stuff since about 1830 —
attempts to use it to stop econ laws and slavery stuff.
Got super-worse with DP cl in 14-1 Amdt.
This case is being brought under “due process”. So Amendment 14 presumably…the catch all and thus over wrought amendment.
Why is it not being raised under Article 1 ยง 10 prohibition of passing ex post facto laws by the States?
Further, in addition to an ex post facto alteration of petition requirements, it seems to me that the State also impairs the obligation of contract…which is also forbidden constitutionally.