The U.S. Supreme Court has assigned a case number to Level the Playing Field v Federal Election Commission: 20-649. The response of the FEC is due December 14. It is highly likely that the FEC will ask for more time to respond. This is the case over presidential general election debates.
The United Coalition USA doesn’t have any problems with equal time and equal treatment for everyone because the threshold is exactly 1/539ths (plus one vote) and that brings coast-to-coast team psychology.
http://www.pprelectoralcollege.com
1/539ths = less than .19 of 1%
Has the “United Coalition” ever put anyone on a general election ballot? If so what was the highest office. Also, this doesn’t mean endorsing a candidate already on the ballot for another party.
I do not know what the Supreme Court will do in this case. I am not optimistic.
However I am very sure of the remedy. Top Six.
If the six political parties that cover the entire political spectrum were all on all ballots, the polling would dramatically alter.
Polling would become much closer, making all six viable to possibly win.
As opposed to the present situation where only a democrat or republican will win.
This is because of Duverger’s Law. Top Six is the remedy to Duverger’s Law.
The polling would level off (Level the Playing Field) to:
Green 27%, Constitution 27%, democrat 17%, republican 17%, Libertarian 13%, Reform/Alliance x unknown variable%.
The United Coalition USA first ran candidates in 1983 Monterey County elections and in 1986 Clint Eastwood ran against us for mayor of Carmel when we got world exposure, publicity and experience.
In 1992 we were campaigning online using Usenet.
You can see a more detailed account on my personal campaign page;
http://www.usparliament.org/google2020.php
See the links to when google launched off my name in 1997 and they brought one-party voting system dictatorship psychology “click the search”, and the correct math, http://www.1ogle.com
J.O. Ogle,
Tell us about Tiffany Briscoe.