Dan Schnur here writes that a multi-party system works better than the two-party system used in the U.S. He is a political scientist and was formerly a high ranking official to California Governor Pete Wilson. Thanks to Independent Voter News for the link.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
How many so-called experts/profs are brain dead ignorant about
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION ??? — around since 1840s — REPEAT 1840S.
—-
PR AND APPV — PENDING CONDORCET [AROUND SINCE 1780S – 1780S]
TOTSOP
https://www.allpartysystem.com/Appeal-to-LNC-Judicial-Committee.php
We have been struggling for 25 years, to show “click the box”, “click the ad”, “click the search” (all voting using clicks instead of numerals 1,2,3,4,etc.), is a one-party voting system.
It might be possible to show two-party voting systems with “click the box”, but plurality elections which bring the two-party system require strict math. No behind the scenes touch-ups and full transparency must be used to get out of one-party voting system with split-vote problem, and that two-party voting system is difficult to demonstrate unless there is the split-vote problem.
There is only one way to bring the three-party system or the 539-party system to the 538-member Electoral College. Limited voting.
I am tired because 25 years has worn me down. The USA vs Google Antitrust Lawsuit will help but unlikely.
The struggle against one-party and two-party voting systems didn’t get the bump we needed in 2020 because the LP bosses never gave us equal time and equal treatment for the United Coalition USA in California where I reside.
I am blocked from California Official LP Facebook page and the Chair only made fun of me saying “LP is a one-party voting system” but she never read my work nor gave me any respect.
I am blocked from helping and labeled a “harrasser” for trying to reach out to women in key posts.
This is same on all three geo-levels.
Read notes about my campaign and you’ll see it was a losing battle for fair treatment.
The LP gets that treatment in all US elections so you would think they’d allow the delegates to be exposed to a different plan. Instead we were blocked. I had planned to get interaction with other candidates and the debate stage was key to us but the party bosses snuffed us out from the get-go by not allowing cross-candidate discussions and debates in California.
My plan is reverse identity politics, showing we can work together as a team, with those not like us. That was opposite of the message that the Jorgensen/Cohen ticket brought.
Her message was divisive against Ds and Rs, particularly the male leaders Trump and Biden.
That harmed our message, the unity phenomena is saying you can work with them and putting her opposite gender ahead of her own, it’s opposite of what she was saying.
Demetra JeffersonWysinger had the correct message all along to the end, that she is campaigning to be on the male victor as his VP, and the Electors’ votes can still make it happen. She was far more favorable to our team than Jorgensen by bringing a message of unity.
Democratic/Wxyz New Day as Prez/VP. The way to bring the three-party system.
See another appeal, to the FEC, “Ogle vs Brin”;
https://www.allpartysystem.com/Appeal-to-FEC.php