California State Trial Court Extends Deadline for Gubernatorial Recall Petition

On November 6, 2020, a California trial court issued an injunction, permitting the proponents of a gubernatorial recall petition to have four more months to complete their petition.  Heatlie v Padilla, Sacramento County Superior Court, 34-2020-800003499.

Without the injunction, the petition would have been due on November 17, 2020.  Now it is due March 17, 2021.  The petition needs 1,495,709 valid signatures.  On December 19, proponents said they have approximately 800,000 signatures.

The basis for the ruling is the covid-19 health crisis.  Earlier in 2020, California state trial courts had granted more time for two statewide initiatives.  However, the federal and state courts in California denied any similar relief to two independent presidential candidates and the Common Sense Party.  The two independent candidates were Don Blankenship of the Constitution Party, and Joseph Kishore of the Socialist Equality Party.  But, in fairness to the courts, the initiative and recall petition proponents had demonstrated that they might have succeeded without the health crisis, a showing that was not made by the independent candidates nor the Common Sense Party.  Also, the Common Sense Party’s efforts (a registration drive) will not be wasted just because they failed to qualify in 2020.  Unlike a petition drive, a registration drive is cumulative and the work done in 2020 for the Common Sense Party might help them qualify for the 2022 election.  Thanks to Eric Garris for this news.

 


Comments

California State Trial Court Extends Deadline for Gubernatorial Recall Petition — 5 Comments

  1. If the Common Sense Party was smart they will actually say we will support candidates of other parties if they show a willingness to compromise. They should get behind rank choice voting. They should say Win Us Over and you will get our second choice vote. Right now we have two cults the Dems and the Repubs

  2. You may recall how Schwartzenegger won the recall election with less than 50%. Recall elections are a logical place for ranked choice voting.

  3. And don’t forget the bizarre recall election in Fall River, Mass back in 2019, when the mayor was both recalled and re-elected in the same election because the field of candidates was crowded. Another example of where ranked choice voting is needed. I’m highly disappointed that voters in Massachusetts didn’t think of this when they voted down Question 2.

  4. WZ — centuries of plurality winner brainwashing —

    sports – horse racing —- Brit first-past-the-post brain R-O-T

    – since 1200s – olde English House of Commons winners.
    —-
    PR and AppV — pending Condorcet
    TOTSOP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.