U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Minnesota Presidential Primary Ballot Access Lawsuit

On February 22, the U.S. Supreme Court revealed that it will not hear De La Fuente v Simon, 20-612, the challenge to the Minnesota law that gives a political party complete control over which presidential primary candidates may appear on that party’s presidential primary ballot. Such laws are rare; the only other states with similar laws are Florida and Georgia. The Court has never heard a presidential primary ballot access case.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Minnesota Presidential Primary Ballot Access Lawsuit — 2 Comments

  1. Blatant violation of NO title of nobility clause – 1-10

    — special faction of all voters having special powers.

    USELESS so-called lawyers and SCOTUS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.