On February 8, some of the plaintiffs in a separate Alabama U.S. House redistricting case asked the original 3-judge panel to rule in their favor, notwithstanding the U.S. Supreme Court stay in a different Alabama redistricting case on the afternoon of February 7. The plaintiffs have a theory under which the 3-judge court could do that. See their filing here. Singleton v Merrill, n.d., 2:21cv-1291. Singleton v Merrill, n.d., 2:21cv-1291.