A decision is expected on Monday, April 11, in Greene v Raffensperger, n.d., 1:22cv-1294. According to this story, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg is likely to rule that Georgia election officials may proceed with the administrative hearing that challenges whether Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene meets the qualifications to run for Congress. The story is based on what the judge said at the oral argument on Friday, April 8.
He’ll be overruled.
First, Eugene, the judge is not a “he.” Thanks for participating, but not actually reading.
Second, is there any grounds other than possibly MAGAtry for your statement, given that you don’t know the sex of the judge?
I’m sorry the original post accidentally omitted the name of the judge. It is now fixed.
Too many New Age unisex names to count ???
The sex of the nudge does not matter, stockfly. The bases for the statement is that the case has zero merit and does not stand much chance in the 11th. If it somehow makes it through, it will be squashed like a cockroach in the 6-3 Supreme Court. MTG is destined for greatness, quite likely Speaker of the House in the upcoming term. There’s no way she will be kept from running for and winning another term. No way, no how, not happening. Hide and watch.
We the people want to see MTG move up as Speaker of the House.
Robert Stockfly with the dumb take like usual.
It’s what’s to be expected from a devil worshipping communist.
The garbage comment on April 11, 2022 at 11:47 am is from Robert K Stock.
No shit, Sherlock 🙂
Stock may have condemned me and my frens to hell but he is powerless.
His curses are limp and flaccid.
Eugene, the case was filed by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, so when you say it has zero merit, it seems backwards, given that you support her. There is only one lawsuit on this matter and Greene is the plaintiff.
Sorry, the judge’s likely ruling has zero merit was what I meant to say.
I’m betting Greene will be taking the oath of office again next term. Any takers?
No, I think you’re right.
1-5-1 special violation of SOP
What does that mean?