Rare New York Times Story on a Libertarian Candidate

The New York Times has a moderately long article about Chase Oliver, the Georgia Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate. Both the internet version and the print version include a picture of Oliver. This is the first New York Times story on any Libertarian candidate all year. The story mentions that Oliver favors Ranked Choice Voting, which in Georgia would save the state from having general election run-offs.


Comments

Rare New York Times Story on a Libertarian Candidate — 12 Comments

  1. On Tuesday Democrats rigged elections in PA, MI, and WI. They’re currently rigging elections in AZ and NV. In AZ Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (who is running for governor) disenfranchised Kari Lake voters by not providing ink to printers in GOP districts in Maricopa County. In NV the election day turnout in Clark County was more than they anticipated so they’re printing more fake Democrat ballots to make up for the leads of the Republicans for governor and Senate. The delays in counting in both states are so election officials can “find” enough ballots to win the races for Democrats.

  2. More idiots coming out of the wood work, now that their bubble is popped.

    Hank the website you linked to clearly shows media outlet websites having bugs in their programming. Media websites are NOT a legitimate source of final vote tallies. They’re projections and guestimations based on exit polls and data from election division websites. That’s why the media says “they’re PROJECTING X or Y candidate won” a state. If you want factual information what until the election divisions release OFFICIAL tabulations in a week.

    People really don’t understand how this works do they? The information reported on election is NOT 100% correct. They do NOT have direct data feeds from the government election divisions. And on top of that, the ballots have to be physically taken (most states use state troopers as the carrier) to a centralized tabulation center where they are manually counted and final official results tabulated a week to two weeks later. The results released by the media and election divisions for the first few days are UNOFFICIAL results that are awaiting manual review, audits, and final certification.

    The final tallies are done in person with the actual ballots or direct physical access to the digital data by the vote counters. The final official results are NOT transmitted digitally/electronically, only the unofficial data is; and that’s just to get some useable data for the media to make guestimations and projections.

  3. Awww… did I strike a nerve? Sorry you’re uneducated. Ignorance is not bliss; it just makes you prove to everyone you’re a gullible moron.

  4. You didn’t really counter any of Rufus’s points about election fraud. All you did was make a long-winded comment about reporting election results.

  5. There are, very occasionally, provable inaccuracies in the final vote count. I’ve gotten the SOTS in my former state to admit to them, although she blamed the election officials in local towns. But those errors are very different from the sort of nonsense spouted by the current Republican party.

    The errors that I got the SOTS to admit to were in the 2012 election. Two towns had reported initial votes for Gary Johnson and some of the other 3rd party candidates for President and down ballot. In the final, certified vote those towns reported zero votes. Other towns where 3rd parties had cross-endorsed a major party candidate had incorrectly swept all of the minor party votes for those candidates into the major party column. It didn’t matter in those elections, but either of those mistakes could have potentially cost a 3rd party ballot access.

    But, as I said, those mistakes weren’t made until the final certification was out, which means I could not point out the mistakes until after that point, but the SOTS said that any corrections would have to be made before the final certification. Catch 22. And the SOTS blamed the town clerks, anyway. I just asked her to give them better instruction in the future.

  6. Thanks to the Libertarian candidate, Walker has a second chance.

    let’s see if the Republicans can handle it any better than they did in 2020.

  7. Herschel Walker would already be Senator elect right now if it wasn’t for loonytarian spoiler and demonrat cheating. You know something for sure ain’t right when a Georgia football hero like Walker, enthusiastically supported by President Trump himself and even a black to boot, doesn’t win in a massive landslide. The real story is he did but is getting cheated out of it. Now we need every Patriot all across Georgia to turn out to vote for our boy Herschel on 6 December and we need as many patriots as possible to come well armed and monitor the polling places in the Demonrat and mixed areas that day for proof of cheating, vote buying and other typical demonrat tricks they pull each and every election.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.