Texas Bill to Create Partisan Registration

Texas Representative Bryan Slaton (R-Royse City), has introduced HB 239. It would create partisan registration in Texas. Currently no Texas voter registration form or any other goverenment form asks voters to choose a party. Here is the text. Thanks to Jim Riley for this news. The bill would apparently permit voters to register as members of an unqualified party.


Comments

Texas Bill to Create Partisan Registration — 30 Comments

  1. The bill says that affiliation will not be effective until the first anniversary of affiliation. A voter could not vote in the March 2024 primary unless they were affiliated with the party by March 2023. But it would be impossible to be affiliated with the party by March 2023 because the law is not in effect yet.

    The affiliation requirement also applies to candidates. So no Democrats or Republicans or Libertarians will be able to be nominated in 2024. Only Independents will be on the ballot in November 2024.

  2. If it’s as Jim describes, it’s got even more problems than screwing up partisan nominations for 2024 (technically, no way they’d actually enforce a system that kicked Republicans off the ballot).

    Correct me if I’m wrong but courts have generally frowned on delays in eligibility to vote (whether for a primary or anything else) that are as long as a year. For example, no state currently requires more than 30 days for people that move into the state or within the state. It would very weird to allow people who moved to vote but those who didn’t to wait a year.

  3. SEE MASS MURDER PURGES IN NAZI GERMANY AND COMMIE SOVIET UNION IN 1930S.

    NOOOO SHORTAGE OF LEFT/RIGHT EXTREMISTS NOW IN USA.

    SEE PENA SHOOTINGS IN NM.

  4. Purging the leftist scum is a good idea, and there are plenty of ways to identify them besides voter registration lists.

  5. Pena shootings are just a start. The man is a hero and a political prisoner, who was unjustly cheated out of the office he won in this past election. Stop the steal!!!

  6. It sounds to me more like he is a false flag plant. After all he is a hispanic/mestizo mud and a formerly convicted felon who already did 7 years in the penitentiary for prior crimes. These are not the type of leaders we need in our European based American homeland, needless to say.

  7. @eeyn,

    I misread the bill. In section 162.003(i) there is an exception for affiliation before December 3l, 2023 which would take effect for the 2024 primary.

    It is not clear whether candidates and party officers could affiliate in time for the December filing deadline.

    A petition signer for a primary candidate does not need to be affiliated with the party. But they would be barred from participating in any other party’s primary. However if they did not change their registration they would not be able to vote in any primary.

  8. @AZ,

    No partisan affiliation in odd years. All voters are absolved of their partisan affiliations on December 31st.

  9. Max is once again correct!

    How do we handle such people in our future law and order theocratic White ethnostate?

    As for mestizos, they should either be all rounded up and deported south of the border, or allowed in the country under the sponsorship of an employer so long as they are gainfully employed or useful domestic servants, but never given citizenship or permanent residency, and certainly never allowed to vote or hold office.

    As for felons, again I don’t see any reason to spend a penny of taxpayer money supporting them or any reason to believe they can ever be rehabilitated. Upon conviction for any felony, the felon should either be publicly and painfully executed the next day, or sold into slavery to a for-profit contractor which assumes full liability in case the felon ever escapes, to be put to hard labor until such contractor finds the felon to no longer be profitable for them, at which time the contractor would be responsible for destroying and disposing of it’s now useless property.

    We need to very strongly stand together in support of our law enforcement heroes and against the dirty criminals and felons. We need to ensure the existence of the White race and a future for White children. In Jesus name we pray. Amen!!!

  10. Bob isn’t entirely wrong, but I think maybe he’s making it too complicated as far as the felons go at least. The simplest and least costly way to deal with the criminal felons is to legally combine the duties of law enforcement officers with those of judge, jury, and executioner. The arresting officer is best capable of determining the guilt or innocence of the offending perp. Backup officers called to the scene of apprehension can serve as a jury of the officer’s peers to make the final determination whether the perp is in fact guilty.

    If found guilty, the execution should be immediate, without any need for useless paperwork or trips downtown. This will also help preserve our natural environment by not wasting resources unnecessarily. We can further help preserve our energy independence by having the trash company pick up the corpses of executed perps and take them down with the rest of the garbage to the power plant to be burned and used to generate electric power.

  11. I am sympathetic to Bob’s argument that perhaps corporate sponsors can generate a profit from felons and from mud races such as mestizos. However, I believe the lessons of history are clear in this regard. We must stand vigilant against the propensity of future generations to become soft and weak and relax the rules, allowing our Race to be bred out of existence somewhere down the line, and our civilization and homeland to be plunged into endless millennia of darkness as so many others have before.

    The best way to ensure against this is to never allow the inferior races to exist within our homelands in any capacity, whether as visitors, guest workers, contracted armies, domestic servants, factory guest workers, or even as field slaves. Don’t give them any excuse for entry to begin with, and there’s no need to worry about the rules being relaxed at some point down the road. Don’t give them an inch, and you don’t have to worry about taking a mile, your daughter, your property, your life, etc.

    What should we do with the ones already here? Give them a reasonable period of a few weeks to self-deport. After that it should be open season, with no bag limit, year round.

    With regards to felons, again I can see how it can be tempting to see the profit potential for corporations to put them into slavery. And I respect the thoughtfulness put into the proposal of having such corporations bear liability in case the felon escapes. But, imagine that it is your home being invaded and your wife and daughters being raped by the escaped felon. Getting an insurance company check to compensate your loss can never be good enough. The best way to steer people away from commiting crimes to begin with is the 100 percent certain guarantee that they will be executed on the spot when and if apprehended, no ifs, ands or butts. Yes, it really is that simple.

  12. @EB,

    It would require a voter to affiliate with a party one year before seeking nomination. If you wanted to run for Congress in 2026, you would have to join before December 2024 so you could file in December 2025. Even if you only wanted to participate in party nominations you would have affiliate by March 2025.

    Some voters would object to having their political beliefs recorded in a government registry.

  13. Riley, those voters should man up (and I do mean man, because only men should be allowed to vote). All voting should be in person in the style of a caucus or town meeting. Voters who can’t stand in front of their neighbors for all to see in their party’s corner and have who they voted for printed in newspapers, on billboards and on government websites, and video of the voting available on government websites and public access cable, should stay home. Far too many people are allowed to vote as it is.

  14. I mean which party they voted for. Voters should never vote for individual candidates. They should only stand in a Party corner or section of the room. One vote per election. The winning party should pick officeholders however it sees fit, and substitute them out at any time like players in a sporting game.

  15. Suggested qualifications for voters:

    1. Register to vote in person at the courthouse before a judge under penalty of perjury and contempt of court;

    2. Pass oral and written literacy and civics tests;

    3. Be a natural born male, verified with birth certificate;

    4. Be of 95% or more verifiable European ancestry, verified with government records and ancestry testing;

    5. Be a property owner in the county where he votes;

    6. Pay substantial poll taxes which will replace all other sources of government revenue;

    7. Be married with at least two children (verified with genetic testing) and never divorced;

    8. Member in good standing of a Christian church which is accepted as legitimate by county and state councils of churches;

    9. Gun owner with at least one gun in verified working order for each male family member at home over the age of 5 and at least one thousand rounds of ammunition;

    10. Military or veteran;

    11. Regular militia member;

    12. His father’s father and his father’s father’s father’s father having been voters and property owners in that same county;

    13. Not be a welfare recipient or government employee except for military, law enforcement officer, justice system employee or winning party appointee to elected office;

    14. Verified with fingerprint, current state driver’s license (no nondriver IDs) and e-verify at registration and voting times;

    15. No past felonies or misdemeanors, judgements of mental incompetence, bankruptcies or undischarged debts;

    16. Over the age of 30;

    17. Gainfully employed or independently wealthy head of household;

    18. No history of homosexual activity, communism, or support for leftist causes.

  16. I would like too see a requirements to pass a test on what the Declaration of Indepence and US Constitution say before people can vote.

    Also, people receiving various forms of government welfare or other special handouts from the state, as well as those employed by an level of government, including those receiving government pensions, and including government contractors, barred from voting and donating to political campaigns.

  17. Andy is correct. However I agree with Haledol that military, law enforcement officers, court officers, judges, officeholders appointed by the winning party, corrections officers, and probation and parole officers should be exempt from that.

  18. No, they should not. In fact, serving or having served in the military should be one of the prerequisites for voting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.