U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Miami Racial Gerrymander Case

On August 17, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request to intervene in the redistricting case for City Commission in Miami. The U.S. District Court had determined that the plan passed by the Commission violates the Voting Rights Act because it injured Latino voters, but the Eleventh Circuit had stayed the U.S. District Court order. The case is not over but the original districts will now be used for this year’s election. Grace v City of Miami, 23A116.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Miami Racial Gerrymander Case — 4 Comments

  1. MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER ROT IN USA SINCE 1776 — 15 AUG 2023

    3 DISTRICT EXAMPLE
    DT AA ZZ TOT
    1 2 1 3 CRACKED
    2 2 1 3 CRACKED
    3 0 3 3 PACKED
    TOT 4 5 9

    GERRYMANDER GANG AA CONTROLS 2-1 WITH 4 MINORITY OF 9 VOTES.

    LARGER GERRYMANDERS —

    1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED GERRYMANDER DISTRICTS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL.

    MINORITY RULE ELECTION SYSTEMS IN THE USA — H. REPS., SENATE, PREZ/VP ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
    A-L-L STATE LEGISLATURES.
    MANY LOCAL GOVT LEGIS. BODIES.

    UNEQUAL WINNER VOTES.
    UNEQUAL DISTRICT VOTES.

    USA CONST – 4-4 RFG AND 14-1 AMDT EP CL SUBVERTED.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering

    SCOTUS UNAWARE OF RFG MEANING-
    NEW YORK V. U.S., 505 U.S. 144, 183-186 (1992) = MAJORITY RULE – DIRECT OR INDIRECT – ESP. IN STATE/LOCAL LEGIS. BODIES.

  2. ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF GERRYMANDER HACKS GETTING PAST THE NEXT ELECTION.

    SCOTUS TOO EVIL CORRUPT/STUPID TO HAVE AUTOMATIC ELECTION REDOS IF ORIGINAL ELECTION IS ILLEGAL

    — CANDIDATE BALLOT ACCESS / ELECTION AREAS / BAD BALLOTS / BAD COUNTS / ETC

  3. @RW,

    It is unlikely that the NAACP is concerned with Hispanic voters. The decision was based on equal protection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.