U.S. District Court Magistrate Recommends that T.R.O. Be Denied in South Carolina Trump Ballot Access Case

On September 27, U.S. District Court Magistrate Shiva v. Hodges recommended that no Temporary Restraining Order be granted in the lawsuit Castro v. South Carolina Election Commission, 3:23cv-4501. This is one of the cases in which the plaintiff, who is a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, is seeking to keep former President Donald Trump off various ballots.

The magistrate says there is no evidence yet that Castro’s campaign is being harmed by leaving Trump on the South Carolina Republican primary ballot. The magistrate says that it is only speculation that if Trump were removed from the ballot that Castro would thereby gain additional votes in the primary or additional campaign contributions. Here is the ruling. The U.S. District Court judge will decide whether to adopt the Magistrate’s recommendation.


Comments

U.S. District Court Magistrate Recommends that T.R.O. Be Denied in South Carolina Trump Ballot Access Case — 2 Comments

  1. The Trump 14th amendment cases are ridiculous even if you don’t recognize the fact the 14th amendment was improperly adopted and needs to be declared null and void.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.