Law Professor and Ballot Access Attorney Mark Brown Writes on Trump, the 14th Amendment, and Ohio

Posted on by November 26, 2023

Capital University law professor and Ballot Access attorney Mark Brown writes in today’s Cleveland Plain Dealer that the fix will be in should anyone try to exclude Donald Trump from the ballot in Ohio in 2024 due to Republican Party dominance of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of its government.

Comments

Law Professor and Ballot Access Attorney Mark Brown Writes on Trump, the 14th Amendment, and Ohio — 14 Comments

  1. TOTAL *FIX* IN ALL REGIMES DUE TO — THE HYDRA 3 —

    MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDERS — BACK TO 1618 (VA)
    AND
    UNEQUAL BALLOT ACCESS LAWS — BACK TO 1888
    AND
    PARTISAN HACK EXECS / JUDICS — BACK TO 1776
    —

    ANY COMMIE / FASCI RATINGS – 0 TO 100 PCT FOR THE A-L-L OF THE EVIL STATIST REGIMES IN THE USA ???
    P-A-T

  5. Cost of the cooked up kangaroo court banana republic persecutions against Trump : way too high for the bogus charges. It will backfire on the derp state – fake news evildoers, like all their myriad (and always failing) schemes against Trump. Thank God for Trump!

  6. Gerry’s salamander was in the 19th century.

    No ballots, no ballot access laws. Implement max plan gradually and directionally.

    Partisan executives = truth in labelling, relatively less tilted playing field.

    100% evil commie fascist leftards = dims, demon rats, socialists, progressive luciferians, globaloney, egalitarian Bolsheviks, cultural Marxists, feminazis, secularists, multiculti open borders traitors, envirosatanists, race mixers / race traitors, synagogue of Satan, prophets of perversion, builders of Babel, diabolical Dummies, lolberts, autistic utopians, Fabian fauscists, Beijing Biden bots.

  7. Every analysis of the 14th amendment, section 3, ought to mention that when it was drafted, there was no means for anyone to prevent any voter from voting for anyone he wished, because there were no government-printed ballots. The intent of the authors of the 14th amendment was never to stop any voter from voting for any candidate he wished. Plainly if the authors of the 14th amendment had intended section 3 to apply to presidential candidates (and that is questionable), they imagined that congress, when it counts the electoral votes, would decide if a presidential candidate is in violation.

  9. NO JUDICIAL POWER IN CONGRESS GERRYMANDER HACKS TO RULE ON PREZ QUALIFICATIONS/DISQUALIFICATIONS.

    1-5-1 SUPER DANGEROUS ENOUGH FOR EACH HOUSE

    FAKE PAT HAS ITS OWN POLITICS DICTIONARY — ESP SYNONYMS ???

  12. It’s not questionable. An early draft mentioned presidential candidates, and it was explicitly taken out after debate or behind the scenes politicking.

    Beijing Biden may have violated the 14th, but treason did not originate with that amendment. The 14th should be declared null and void, and Quisling Biden would still be a traitor and puppet.

    Unlike AZ, I’m not an it or fake. She/her, 100% real, made in the USA. Every political term I use is used by many other people, although perhaps not in the fake news AZ reads and recycles. Certainly, every term I use is much more widely used and understood than the frequently indecipherable politburospeak ingsoc newspeak AZ spouts, of which perhaps half or more would be understood by 1% of English speakers at best, and probably much less.

    NY Post is only slightly better than AZ’s typical fake news sources – mostly controlled “conservative” opposition, like sister company Lazy Fox News. The British monarchy has been largely ceremonial for centuries now. It’s their business and not really any of our concern, but I don’t see how it makes much difference either way – it has little to no influence over how British government functions in the modern era. Whether it stays or goes won’t make any real difference in their policies, and they have much more real problems in that country than the survival or lack thereof of, essentially, a showbiz pretend monarchy.

  14. 18 USC – ZILLION USA CRIMES
    —–

    §2383. Rebellion or insurrection

    Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
    Historical and Revision Notes
    Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §4 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §4, 35 Stat. 1088). [EARLIER 1878 REV STAT — 1862 LAW]

    Word “moreover” was deleted as surplusage and minor changes were made in phraseology.

    Editorial Notes
    Amendments
    1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $10,000”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.