U.S. District Court Rules Against Cenk Uygur in South Carolina Democratic Primary Case

On January 16, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph F. Anderson, a Reagan appointee, explained why he orally kept Cenk Uygur off the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary when the case was argued.  Here is the 17-page decision in Uygur v South Carolina, 3:23cv-6879.

Uygur, who was born in Turkey, had argued that the Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protecdtion Clause, had silently repealed the Provision of Article II that requires presidents to be “natural born.”  Thanks to Electionlawblog for this news.


Comments

U.S. District Court Rules Against Cenk Uygur in South Carolina Democratic Primary Case — 14 Comments

  1. The 14th amendment, another improperly ratified idiocy that’s long overdue to be declared null and void.

  2. NBC —

    FATHER WAS A USA CITIZEN [IE HAD ALLEGIANCE TO USA] WHEN KID [LATER USA PREZ CANDIDATE] WAS BORN

    AFTER BIRTH CHANGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO ANOTHER NATION-STATE = NATURALIZATION

    PLACE OF BIRTH MEANS ZERO

    *ALLEGIANCE* SEE LAST PARA OF 4 JULY 1776 DOI
    ———

    MEDIA BRAINDEAD — COURTS BRAINDEAD ABOUT BASIC 001 GOVT STUFF — ESP SCOTUS HACKS —

    DUE TO NON/ROTTED CONST LAW *RESEARCH* GIVEN THEM BY USELESS HACK LAWYERS SINCE 1789 —

    SINCE NONE OF THE SCOTUS HACKS EVER DID ANY OF THEIR OWN APPARENTLY

  3. NBC ALSO SCREWED UP IN 14-1 CITIZEN SENTENCE —

    *** AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF ***

    RESIDE – IN A TENT / HOLE IN GROUND / CAVE / TREE / BALLOON CONNECTED TO GROUND / PLUS MERE HOUSES / APTS

  4. WHICH MONSTER IS CLAIMING TO BE THE FIRST IN LINE AFTER CAIN [FIRST REPORTED KILLER OF A HUMAN- ABEL] —

    TYRANT TRUMP / TYRANT PUTIN / TYRANT XI / ETC

    AND THUS — THE ANTI-CHRIST

  5. I actually agree with AZ on one thing. NBC is screwed up, especially when they went woke. Their news department is all commies and thus, FAKE

  6. There is no constitutional provision establishing a standard of “frivolity” for candidates for the states to apply to their ballot access laws. At the time of ratification there were no ballot access laws, there were voter eligibility laws. The regulation of candidate eligibility to hold office is an innovation by states by legislative adoption of secret ballot laws requiring confiscation of the original right of the voter to publish a ballot and monopolizing ballot publishing to state officials chosen by political partisans.
    The whole justification for limiting the number of candidates the state will print on their monopoly ballot is to ration the choices presented to the voter because too many printed names could be confusing and delay balloting. Yet most states still allow voters to take the time to write-in candidates who the state has not printed. Nine states do not even allow such write-in voting making the state ballot publishing monopoly even more exclusionary of voter free choice.
    The presumption has been made that because the states are arrogated a monopoly of ballot publication to hold “orderly” elections it can also adjudicate candidate qualifications prior to voters having the opportunity to do so for themselves.
    In sum, the administration of elections is prior censorship of voters and discrimination against candidates who offer ideas to voters on the conduct of government. Such election rigging justifies characterizing it as fascistic.

  7. THE JONES-SANTOS CAMPAIGN IS ATTEMPTING TO GET FREE AIRTIME ON NBC. WE HAVE SENT THEM A SINGLE FORM PETITION

  8. Folks here are making good points about the rotten 14th amendment and fake news NBC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.