On March 20, the Idaho legislature passed SB 1244. It expands the zone around polling places in which petitioning and other types of speech about the election is prohibited.
Meanwhile, the case against Wyoming’s 250 feet zone is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court has not yet set a date to consider whether to hear the case. Lee v Frank, 23-901.
STILL NOOO DISTANCES IN THE 1 AMDT.
@AZ,
No mention of Idaho legislature in 1st Amendment.
JR
NOOO MENTION OF ANY SPECIFIC STATE LEGIS IN 1 AMDT OR ENTIRE USA CONST
A-L-L OF THEM HAVE BEEN ANTI-DEMOCRACY MINORITY RULE LEGIS BODIES SINCE 1776–
ENACTING LAWS ESP VIOLATING THE 1 AMDT/14-1 PI CLAUSE SINCE 1791/1868.
—
PR
Jim Riley is right. The incorporation doctrine is nonsense.
INCORPORATION OF 1-8 AMDTS ON STATES VIA 14-1 AMDT PI CLAUSE – USA CITIZENS
NOT DP CLAUSE
NON-USA CITIZENS GET 1-8 AMDTS PROTECTION VIA 14-1 EP CL
False court doctrine, on top of it being an improperly adopted amendment.
Idaho: No politics within 250 feet of voting place
Iowa: Yes politics INSIDE voting place (caucus)
Different type of election, but still makes you stop and think.
Iowa > Idaho
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/03/22/supreme-court-wyoming-election-buffer-zone/73052525007/?tbref=hp
WY CASE
Incorporation doctrine is hot garbage.