On July 10, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph N. Laplante, a Bush Jr. appointee, again blocked President Trump’s Executive Order on birthright citizenship. New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v Trump, 1:25cv-38. The judge had previously blocked it on February 10. This time the case had become a class action lawsuit.
Casa
Supreme Court time.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/10/politics/birthright-citizenship-hearing-rhode-island
Federal judge issues new nationwide block against Trump’s order seeking to end birthright citizenship
By Devan Cole, CNN
Updated 11:16 AM EDT, Thu July 10, 2025
Concord, New Hampshire CNN —
A federal judge agreed Thursday to issue a new nationwide block against President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship.
The ruling from US District Judge Joseph Laplante is significant because the Supreme Court last month curbed the power of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions, while keeping intact the ability of plaintiffs to seek a widespread block of the order through class action lawsuits, which is what happened Thursday in New Hampshire.
—
NOOOOOO power in a USA Prez to define text of USA Const
1803 Marbury vs Madison – ONLY judicial power
Lol more fake news from the AZ spambot.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-weigh-blocking-trump-birthright-100713880.html
REUTERS STORY
Supreme court said they can’t do this already. So their injunctions have no force except possibly in their district.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/challenge-trump-birthright-citizenship-order-090025270.html
OPINION LINK IN FIRST PART OF STORY —
A federal judge agreed Thursday to >>> issue a new nationwide block <<< against President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship.
If a case goes to the supreme court and they issue a ruling like casa doesn’t that override subsequent lower court decisions ?
What would then be the point of appeals to supreme court again? What could they say or do the second time that they couldn’t the first?
The president isn’t defining what the constitution says. He’s simply clarifying what it said all along. Even the wrongly decided Wong Kim case concerned a legal permanent resident, as the court took time to explain in that case.
Please