Nine State Libertarian Parties Files Amicus Curiae Brief in U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Asset Forfeiture Case

Last month, nine state Libertarian Parties filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving the constitutionality of civil assert forfeiture in certain situations. The case is Barton v Securities & Exchange Commission, 25-465. The state parties are Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.

Also the We the People Party of Pennsylvania signed on. Here is the amicus.


Comments

Nine State Libertarian Parties Files Amicus Curiae Brief in U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Asset Forfeiture Case — 2 Comments

  1. Excellent effort to preserve freedom from arbitrary government overreach. Kudos to the state Libertarian Parties and Timothy Barton. I hope they will be successful.

  2. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    JOHN DOE v. DYNAMIC PHYSICAL
    THERAPY, LLC, ET AL.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT
    OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT
    No. 25–180. Decided December 8, 2025
    PER CURIAM.
    Louisiana immunizes healthcare providers from civil lia-
    bility during public health emergencies. La. Rev. Stat. Ann.
    §29:771(B)(2)(c)(i) (West 2022). Below, the Louisiana Court
    of Appeal held that this state statute barred plaintiff’s fed-
    eral claims. 2024–0723, pp. 11–12 (1 Cir. 12/27/24), 404
    So. 3d 1008, 1017–1018, writ denied, 2025–00105 (La.
    4/29/25), 407 So. 3d 623. That decision is incorrect. Defin-
    ing the scope of liability under state law is the State’s pre-
    rogative. But a State has no power to confer immunity from
    federal causes of action. See, e.g., Howlett v. Rose, 496 U. S.
    356, 383 (1990); Haywood v. Drown, 556 U. S. 729, 740
    (2009); Williams v. Reed, 604 U. S. 168, 174 (2025). “[T]he
    Judges in every State” are bound to follow federal law, “any
    Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Con-
    trary notwithstanding.” U. S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2.
    Plaintiff’s federal claims may well fail on other federal
    grounds. Cf. Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, 596 U. S.
    212, 222 (2022). But that is for the Louisiana courts to de-
    cide in the first instance. The petition for certiorari is
    granted, the judgment of the Louisiana Court of Appeal is
    reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings
    not inconsistent with this opinion.
    It is so ordered.
    —–
    PUT THE LA MORON JUDGES IN A FED JAIL — TO STUDY THE USA CONST / LAWS AND SCOTUS OPS ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.