On January 29, California filed this brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Tangipa v Newsom, 25A839. This is the lawsuit over California’s redistricting.
On January 29, California filed this brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Tangipa v Newsom, 25A839. This is the lawsuit over California’s redistricting.
ZERO MENTION OF 1/2 VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED G DISTS = 1/4 CONTROL
—
PR IN ALL LEGIS BODY ELECTIONS
TOTAL VOTES / TOTAL MEMBERS = EQUAL VOTES TO ELECT EACH MEMBER
@AZ,
Such an argument would probably be made in an amicus brief (perhaps from someone in Michigan?).