On January 30, the California Republicans who are challenging the new U.S. House district boundaries filed this Reply Brief in the U.S. Supreme Court. Tangipa v Newsom, 25A839.
On January 30, the California Republicans who are challenging the new U.S. House district boundaries filed this Reply Brief in the U.S. Supreme Court. Tangipa v Newsom, 25A839.
ANTI-DEMOCRACY MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER GOVTS —
USA GOVT, ALL 50 STATE GOVTS AND MANY LOCAL GOVTS.
USA CONST SUBVERTED I-2 MAJORITY + MINORITY REPRESENTATION FROM EACH STATE [USA REPS] / 4-4 RFG [STATES/LOCALS] / 14-1 AMDT EP CL [ALL]
———
GERRYMANDER MATH 001 – MINI INFO — 25 PERCENT MINORITY RULE
1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED GERRYMANDER AREAS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL = MINORITY RULE OLIGARCHY OFTEN WITH LAWLESS MONARCH TYRANTS.
SUPER WORSE EXTREMIST PRIMARY MATH.
MAJOR RESULT — THE LAWLESS TYRANT EXECS / JUDICS MAKING DEFACTO SPECIAL INTEREST GANG LAWS VIA EXEC ORDERS / COURT OPINIONS.
REMEDY – NOOO PRIMARIES AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION – P.R.—–
TOTAL VOTES / TOTAL MEMBERS = EQUAL VOTES TO ELECT EACH MEMBER IN LEGISLATIVE BODIES. [TOVTOM METHOD]
NONPARTISAN EXECS/JUDICS VIA APPROVAL VOTING.